Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

23
Reports
23
Properties concerned
18
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2010close
Date end:2010close
Threats* : Ground transport infrastructureclose
Agra Fort (2010)
States Parties: India
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Bordeaux, Port of the Moon (2010)
States Parties: France
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
City of Vicenza and the Palladian Villas of the Veneto (2010)
States Parties: Italy
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex (2010)
States Parties: Thailand
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors
Fatehpur Sikri (2010)
States Parties: India
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Areas of Istanbul (2010)
States Parties: Türkiye
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas);
Historic Centre of Lima (2010)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu (2010)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Historical Centre of the City of Arequipa (2010)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Iguaçu National Park (2010)
States Parties: Brazil
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Niokolo-Koba National Park (2010)
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Okapi Wildlife Reserve (2010)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Danger List:  Yes
Old City of Salamanca (2010)
States Parties: Spain
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Port, Fortresses and Group of Monuments, Cartagena (2010)
States Parties: Colombia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Simien National Park (2010)
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: a) Declining populations of Walia ibex, Ethiopian wolf and other large mammal species;
Danger List:  Yes
Taj Mahal (2010)
States Parties: India
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Tasmanian Wilderness (2010)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra (2010)
States Parties: Indonesia
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Tyre (2010)
States Parties: Lebanon
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance
Upper Middle Rhine Valley (2010)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Ground transport infrastructure
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Australia Brazil Colombia Democratic Republic of the Congo Ethiopia France Germany India Indonesia Italy Lebanon Peru Russian Federation Senegal Spain Thailand Türkiye United States of America
Threats
Ground transport infrastructure 23

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top