Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Parthian Fortresses of Nisa

Turkmenistan
Factors affecting the property in 2009*
  • Interpretative and visitation facilities
  • Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

Lack of interpretation and visitor management plan.

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2009
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2009**
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2009

At its 32nd session (Quebec City, 2008), the World Heritage Committee requested the State Party to submit a interpretation and visitor management plan and to provide three copies of the completed management plan.

The State Party submitted its report on 28 January 2009. A summary management plan activities against results achieved to date is included as part of the report. The schedule is presented in five sections – site protection, conservation, promotion and education, presentation and interpretation and visitor management. Each section is dealt with under headings of ‘regular activities to be implemented’, ‘short term activities’ and ‘long term activities’ up to 2010. The plan indicates that work has been accomplished on all sections.

 

A detailed interpretation and visitor management plan has not been submitted as a separate plan, but proposed actions to 2010 are indicated in the summary management plan. They include increasing the number and training of guides, and the construction of a new site museum and visitor facilities. The location of the latter is not indicated. Presentation and interpretation works have included the installation of site location maps and plans at the entrance, and information boards in English, Russian and Turkmen at the archaeological sites.

 

The report also outlines progress on the following:

a) Site protection works completed in 2008 include drainage works to the Red Building complex at Old Nisa, the planting of a hedge around Old Nisa and the development of new visitor routes around the property via corridors connecting halls, aimed at avoiding visitor access on walls.

b) Conservation works completed in 2008 include roof drainage at the Site Museum; conservation of the Red Building, partial restoration of the exterior walls of the Round Building and cleaning and partial restoration of the Great Square Building and auxiliary structures.

c) Promotion and education works completed in 2008 include development of a new tourist route for the Great Square Building, and interpretation material about the property including a booklet, post cards and brochures.

The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies consider that the positive progress made in implementing the management plan covers most of the recommendations made at the time of inscription (Decision 31 COM 8B.30). Key priorities of site drainage and conservation/protection of the excavated remains have been addressed.

Since the management plan covers only the period up to 2010, consideration should now be given to revising the Plan for a further three to five years to identify action plans in the following five years to 2015, so that applications for national budget and/ or other funding can be secured in a timely manner.

In the framework of the forthcoming periodic reporting exercise for the Asia Pacific region, the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies will provide assistance to the State Party to formulate a Statement of Outstanding Universal Value for the property.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2009
33 COM 7B.83
Parthian Fortresses of Nisa (Turkmenistan) (C 1242)

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7B,

2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 8B.30 and 32 COM 7B.78, adopted at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007) and 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) sessions respectively,

3. Notes the summary management plan submitted by the State Party and progress that has been made by the State Party on the implementation of the management plan, including interpretation and visitor management;

4. Requests the State Party to keep the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies informed on the design and location of the proposed new site museum and visitor facilities;

5. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2010, a progress report on the implementation and revision of the management plan, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session in 2010.

Draft Decision: 33 COM 7B.83

The World Heritage Committee,

1. Having examined Document WHC-09/33.COM/7B,

2. Recalling Decisions 31 COM 8B.30 and 32 COM 7B.78, adopted at its 31st (Christchurch, 2007) and 32nd (Quebec City, 2008) sessions respectively,

3. Notes the summary management plan submitted by the State Party and progress that has been made by the State Party on the implementation of the management plan, including interpretation and visitor management;

4. Requests the State Party to keep the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies informed on the design and location of the proposed new site museum and visitor facilities;

5. Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2010, a progress report on the implementation and revision of the management plan, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 34th session in 2010.

Report year: 2009
Turkmenistan
Date of Inscription: 2007
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iii)
Documents examined by the Committee
arrow_circle_right 33COM (2009)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top