Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Central Sikhote-Alin

Russian Federation
Factors affecting the property in 2023*
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Other Threats:


Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Management systems/ management plan (incomplete process of configuration and designation of the property’s buffer zone; and need to finalize the Integrated Management Plan)
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2023

N/A

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2023
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2023**

N/A

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2023

On 1 December 2022, the State Party submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/766/documents/ and on 20 March 2023, it submitted additional information at the request of the World Heritage Centre, reporting the following:

  • Progress has been made towards expanding the Sikhote-Alin Reserve by a further 500 hectares (ha) of terrestrial territory and 1,200 ha of the marine area in the Sea of Japan;
  • Cadastral work has been carried out by staff of the scientific department of the Sikhote-Alin Reserve to delineate the proposed extended boundaries of the reserve and the buffer zone, alongside scientific justification for the inclusion of these areas within the reserve. A dossier is being prepared for submission to the Government of the Russian Federation to approve the extension of the reserve;
  • The process of preparing the rationale, draft regulations and the boundaries of the buffer zone of Bikin National Park has been completed, and approval is currently being sought from the Primorsky and Khabarovsk Krai administrations. In 2023, the necessary documents will be sent to the Russian Ministry of Natural Resources for approval;
  • In 2019, a Coordinating Council for the property was established, including representatives from the Sikhote-Alin Reserve and the Bikin National Park. The tasks of the Council include the development of a Joint Action Plan aimed at developing educational tourism, expanding scientific research, including the study of the Amur tiger. Council meetings are held, as necessary, to resolve topical issues on the joint management of the property;
  • On all tourist routes of the reserve, monitoring plots have been established, and flora and fauna monitoring activities have been carried out through floral inventories and camera traps;
  • In 2022, a new tourist route ‘Trail of Tigers’ was opened in the central part of the reserve and the cedar-broad-leaved taiga zone. The trail will reduce the load from tourist flow in other parts of the property making it possible to increase the number of visitors to the reserve every year, without harming the unique natural ecosystems.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2023

The establishment of a Coordinating Council for the integrated management of the property is appreciated, and the State Party should be encouraged to ensure that the Council continues to implement tasks proposed in the Joint Action Plan of the Integrated Management Plan (IMP) that will enhance integrated management of the property. The State Party should be encouraged to ensure that representatives from all component parts are represented on the Council.

The progress on finalizing the buffer zone around the Sikhote Alin Reserve and the Bikin National Park components is noted. However, no information is provided regarding the area of these buffer zones, which need to be of an adequate size and configuration to effectively provide ecological connectivity for the whole property and protect it from threats arising from outside the property boundaries, as noted in the 2018 IUCN Evaluation report and related Committee decisions. The Committee should therefore reiterate its request to the State Party to ensure that the process of designating an adequate buffer zone for the property is undertaken in a coordinated manner across all components and to finalize the formalization of buffer zones for the whole property, consistent with the requirements of the Operational Guidelines and in line with the recommendations of the 2018 IUCN Evaluation.

Efforts to increase the territory of the Sikhote-Alin Reserve as part of measures to enhance connectivity of tiger habitats are noted with appreciation. Once the extension is completed under national legislation, the State Party should be encouraged to develop a proposal for a minor boundary modification to align the boundaries of the World Heritage property with those of the extended reserve and, in addition, to formally designate the abovementioned buffer zone under the Convention, in line with the Committee’s previous requests. However, previous concerns regarding connectivity at the landscape level, including but not limited to effective buffer zone arrangements and measured land and resource use remain. Therefore, the State Party should be urged to further address the recommendations made by the Committee to develop and adopt a long-term vision to ensure connectivity of Amur tiger habitat at the landscape level through a range of strategies, including building enhanced connectivity with other protected areas and investigating conservation connectivity strategies outside the formal protected area system. 

Conflicting information was provided by the State Party regarding the development of an eco-tourism strategy for the Sikhote-Alin Reserve and the implementation of comprehensive monitoring activities to monitor the impacts of visitation on key species. The State Party should therefore be requested to clarify the status of the strategy and submit it to the World Heritage Centre, for review by IUCN, when available. To ensure its sustainable implementation, the strategy should include a monitoring and action plan that clearly defines the type of activities permitted and describes how impacts of tourism and recreational use will be monitored and controlled across the entire property.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2023
45 COM 7B.94
Central Sikhote-Alin (Russian Federation) (N 766bis)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.105 adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Welcomes the establishment of a Coordinating Council for the integrated management of the property and encourages the State Party to ensure that the Council implements tasks proposed in the Joint Action Plan of the Integrated Management Plan that will enhance integrated management of the property, and to ensure representation from all component parts of the property;
  4. Recalling previous concerns around the limited protection conveyed by the proposed buffer zone of the Bikin National Park and large-scale logging activities and the associated increase in forest roads along the boundaries of the Sikhote-Alin Strict Nature Reserve, requests to the State Party to:
    1. Ensure that the process of designating an adequate buffer zone for the property is undertaken in a coordinated manner across all components,
    2. Finalize the designation of an adequate formal buffer zone for the Bikin River Valley component, as already requested by Decision 42 COM 8B.9 and in line with the recommendations of the 2018 IUCN Evaluation,
    3. Strengthen the regulation, in the Sikhote-Alin Strict Nature Reserve, of logging activities in the vicinity of the property beyond the buffer zone;
  5. Notes with appreciation the progress in extending the boundaries of the Sikhote-Alin Strict Nature Reserve, and also requests the State Party to submit a proposal through a Minor Boundary Modification procedure to reflect the extension in the inscribed property, as well as formally designate the buffer zones for the property under the Convention, in conformity with Paragraphs 163 and 164 of the Operational Guidelines;
  6. Urges the State Party to develop and adopt a long-term vision to ensure the connectivity of Amur tiger habitat at the landscape level, through a range of strategies, including building enhanced connectivity with other protected areas, and investigating conservation connectivity strategies outside the formal protected area system;
  7. Further requests the State Party to clarify the status of the eco-tourism strategy for the entire property, submit it to the World Heritage Centre for review by IUCN when available, and ensure that it clearly defines the type of activities permitted and outlines how impacts of tourism and recreational use will be monitored and controlled across the entire property;
  8. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for review by the World Heritage Centre and IUCN.
Draft Decision: 45 COM 7B.94

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.105, adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Welcomes the establishment of a Coordinating Council for the integrated management of the property and encourages the State Party to ensure that the Council implements tasks proposed in the Joint Action Plan of the Integrated Management Plan that will enhance integrated management of the property, and to ensure representation from all component parts of the property;
  4. Recalling previous concerns around the limited protection conveyed by the proposed buffer zone of the Bikin National Park and large-scale logging activities and the associated increase in forest roads along the boundaries of the Sikhote-Alin Strict Nature Reserve, requests to the State Party to:
    1. Ensure that the process of designating an adequate buffer zone for the property is undertaken in a coordinated manner across all components,
    2. Finalize the designation of an adequate formal buffer zone for the Bikin River Valley component, as already requested by Decision 42 COM 8B.9 and in line with the recommendations of the 2018 IUCN Evaluation,
    3. Strengthen the regulation, in the Sikhote-Alin Strict Nature Reserve, of logging activities in the vicinity of the property beyond the buffer zone;
  5. Notes with appreciation the progress in extending the boundaries of the Sikhote-Alin Strict Nature Reserve, and also requests the State Party to submit a proposal through a Minor Boundary Modification procedure to reflect the extension in the inscribed property, as well as formally designate the buffer zones for the property under the Convention, in conformity with Paragraphs 163 and 164 of the Operational Guidelines;
  6. Urges the State Party to develop and adopt a long-term vision to ensure the connectivity of Amur tiger habitat at the landscape level, through a range of strategies, including building enhanced connectivity with other protected areas, and investigating conservation connectivity strategies outside the formal protected area system;
  7. Further requests the State Party to clarify the status of the eco-tourism strategy for the entire property, submit it to the World Heritage Centre for review by IUCN when available, and ensure that it clearly defines the type of activities permitted and outlines how impacts of tourism and recreational use will be monitored and controlled across the entire property;
  8. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for review by the World Heritage Centre and IUCN.
Report year: 2023
Russian Federation
Date of Inscription: 2001
Category: Natural
Criteria: (x)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2022) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 45COM (2023)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top