Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Factors affecting the property in 2023*
  • Commercial development
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Mining
  • Society's valuing of heritage
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Resumption of mining activities
  • Inappropriate developments (note that the previously raised issue of the new supermarket built at Hayle Harbour has since been resolved)
  • Potential impact of new development projects
  • Management and institutional factors / Improvements to the planning tools and approval processes not yet completed and implemented 
  • Social/cultural uses of heritage
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2023

N/A

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2023
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2023**

October 2013: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission; January 2015: Joint ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2023

On 30 November 2022, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1215/documents/. Progress in a number of conservation issues addressed by the Committee at its previous sessions is reported as follows:

  • The World Heritage Site (WHS) Supplementary Planning Document, the Planning Performance Agreements and neighbourhood development plans and the use of the WHS Planning Toolkit are actively applied to protect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property. The Management Plan for the property was adopted in January 2021. In 2021 and 2022, a governance review involving stakeholders was undertaken with the aim to ensure a robust management structure;
  • Early engagement occurs between Historic England and the WHS Planning Officer about specific planning applications and Historic England is represented on the property’s Technical Panel;
  • A collaborative process will address the recommendations of the February 2022 technical review by ICOMOS of the North Quay Phase 2 proposals and the need for further revisions to the Hilltop site. The Local Planning Authority awaits submission of these revisions for formal assessment, after which the State Party will seek further input from ICOMOS;
  • Planning permission for the South Crofty Mine was granted in 2011 conditionally on the terms that the protection of areas of archaeological/historical interest was addressed and the boundary treatment approved by the Minerals Planning Authority. An explanation of boundary treatments was submitted to the World Heritage Centre on 14 July 2021, noting that the mine site boundary had already been addressed through a condition discharged on 14 October 2016;
  • Research and interpretation across the property and stakeholder involvement has increased. In partnership with the Cornish Buildings Group, buildings that enhance the property through its design and heritage-led regeneration have been awarded. The renovation of the Guildhall in Tavistock has been completed and it functions as an interpretation centre for the property.

On 6 December 2022, the State Party submitted information and documentation on two planning applications for housing at Lower Boscaswell within the St Just Mining District, and results of research conducted by Plymouth University which identified concerns about arsenic levels in the soil within parts of the Tamar Valley Mining District, in reply to a letter from the World Heritage Centre under Paragraph 174 of the Operational Guidelines, dated 22 August 2022.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2023

The continued application of the WHS Supplementary Planning Document, the WHS Planning Toolkit, Planning Performance Agreements, neighbourhood development plans and the revised Management Plan in January 2021 are welcomed.

It remains vital to seek and implement the advice of both Historic England and the WHS Planning Officer for planning applications that may affect the OUV of the property. These applications should be referred to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, with adequate time for consultation, rather than being addressed solely through the UK planning process as occurred for the Lower Boscaswell developments, about which the World Heritage Centre was informed by third parties. Any development that may have an impact on the OUV of the property should be subject to an impact assessment using the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context.

Following ICOMOS technical reviews in September 2018, April and July 2019, February 2021 and February 2022 for the North Quay Phase 2 projects, a number of ICOMOS’ recommendations have been addressed. The issues at the Eastern Gateway and East Quay have been resolved, but the planned housing development at the Hilltop site remains unsatisfactory. The ICOMOS technical review of February 2022, concurred with Historic England that the scale and extent of the proposed housing and associated features would overwhelm the natural setting. The Committee should confirm that this housing development should be revised in accordance with ICOMOS recommendations and request the State Party to submit the revised plans for review prior to consideration by the Local Planning Authority.

Regarding the reopening of the South Crofty Mine, partly located within the property, the procedural information regarding the discharged condition is noted. However, the information provided in the State Party state of conservation report does not provide an update on the current status of the re-commencement of mining activities. Therefore, it is recommended that the Committee request the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies a comprehensive information package on the current status of this project, taking into account the recommendations of the 2013 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission. In the case of any plans for the potential reopening of the South Crofty Mine, it is also recalled that, in line with Paragraph 118bis of the Operational Guidelines, impact assessments shall be carried out as a pre-requisite for development projects and activities that are planned for implementation within or around a World Heritage property to ensure the long-term safeguarding of OUV.

The State Party’s efforts regarding research, interpretation and stakeholder involvement across the property should be acknowledged.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2023
45 COM 7B.204
Cornwall and West Devon Mining Landscape (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) (C 1215)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.60 adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Welcomes the continued application of the World Heritage Site (WHS) Supplementary Planning Document, WHS Planning Toolkit, Planning Performance Agreements, and neighbourhood development plans to protect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, the progress made in the implementation of the recommendations of the 2015 ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission and previous Committee decisions, as well as the adoption of the revised Management Plan for the property;
  4. Also welcomes the early engagement of Historic England in specific planning applications and in wider guidance and policy implementation, and encourages the State Party to ensure that the advice of Historic England and the WHS Planning Officer continue to inform statutory decision making;
  5. Notes the ongoing engagement regarding the North Quay Phase 2 projects and the commitment to implement the recommendations provided by ICOMOS, and requests the State Party to submit revised plans for the Hilltop site, amended in line with the recommendations of ICOMOS, to the World Heritage Centre for review by ICOMOS before granting approval;
  6. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party concerning the South Crofty Mine, and in particular the details requested on the boundary treatment, but considers that further updated information should be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, and therefore requests the State Party to submit a comprehensive information package on the current status of this project, taking into account the recommendations of the 2013 mission and recalls that any plans of a potential reopening of the mine shall be subject to impact assessments in line with Paragraph 118bis of the Operational Guidelines and using the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context;
  7. Invites the State Party to continue to ensure that, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, details of significant changes to statutory documents and any new planning applications which may impact on the OUV of the property are submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before final decisions are taken;
  8. Further acknowledges the efforts made by the State Party for increased interpretation, research and stakeholder involvement across the property;
  9. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session.
Draft Decision: 45 COM 7B.204

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.60, adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Welcomes the continued application of the World Heritage Site (WHS) Supplementary Planning Document, WHS Planning Toolkit, Planning Performance Agreements, and neighbourhood development plans to protect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, the progress made in the implementation of the recommendations of the 2015 ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission and previous Committee decisions, as well as the adoption of the revised Management Plan for the property;
  4. Also welcomes the early engagement of Historic England in specific planning applications and in wider guidance and policy implementation, and encourages the State Party to ensure that the advice of Historic England and the WHS Planning Officer continue to inform statutory decision making;
  5. Notes the ongoing engagement regarding the North Quay Phase 2 projects and the commitment to implement the recommendations provided by ICOMOS, and requests the State Party to submit revised plans for the Hilltop site, amended in line with the recommendations of ICOMOS, to the World Heritage Centre for review by ICOMOS before granting approval;
  6. Acknowledges the information provided by the State Party concerning the South Crofty Mine, and in particular the details requested on the boundary treatment, but considers that further updated information should be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, and therefore requests the State Party to submit a comprehensive information package on the current status of this project, taking into account the recommendations of the 2013 mission and recalls that any plans of a potential reopening of the mine shall be subject to impact assessments in line with Paragraph 118bis of the Operational Guidelines and using the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context;
  7. Invites the State Party to continue to ensure that, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines, details of significant changes to statutory documents and any new planning applications which may impact on the OUV of the property are submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before final decisions are taken;
  8. Further acknowledges the efforts made by the State Party for increased interpretation, research and stakeholder involvement across the property;
  9. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session.
Report year: 2023
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Date of Inscription: 2006
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iii)(iv)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2022) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 45COM (2023)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top