Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Baptism Site “Bethany Beyond the Jordan” (Al-Maghtas)

Jordan
Factors affecting the property in 2023*
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Other Threats:

    Buildings and Development (lack of design and construction guidelines) Preservation of important vistas and sightlines of the property

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Buildings and Development: Lack of design and construction guidelines for the Churches to be constructed in the buffer zone
  • Management systems/ management plan: Lack of integration of the management procedures on maintenance, visitor management and disaster response in the management system
  • Need to ensure the protection of the western banks of the Jordan River to preserve important vistas and sightlines of the property
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2023

N/A

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2023
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2023**

N/A

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2023

On 29 November 2022, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, an executive summary of which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1446/documents/. Progress in a number of conservation issues addressed by the Committee at its previous sessions is presented, as follows:

  • An Updated Earthquake Response Preparation Plan and a Guidance of Flash Flood Response Plan have been developed. The actions and policies stemming from these documents will be integrated into the Management Plan that is currently being revised to reflect the protection of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) and take into account the evolving management of the site;
  • The Baptism Site Commission (BSC) and key stakeholders are working on the Master Plan for the Baptism Site and buffer zone, a draft of which will be shared with the World Heritage Centre once finalized. As part of this process a new not-for-profit body, the Institution for Development of Lands Adjacent to the Baptism Site, was created in 2021 to develop a newly defined ‘Baptism Development Zone’ east of the property and within the buffer zone, for pilgrim, visitor, administration and agricultural purposes. This is separate from the church’s development area;
  • The Convention Centre located in the buffer zone, about which the Committee has made previous requests for information in relation to its design and location, was completed in 2012 prior to inscription. Relocation is not feasible;
  • The BSC in partnership with the Ministry of Environment, are working on defining new boundaries for the Baptism Site Nature Reserve at the national level, in accordance with Environmental Protection Law No. 6 of 2017 to enhance the legal protection of the boundaries of the Baptism Site. This will take at least two years;
  • A revision is being carried out for the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) to address completed and new building development in the buffer zone, as requested by the Committee, as well as for the design and construction guidelines for new churches in the buffer zone, in cooperation with the Arab Regional Centre for World Heritage (ARC-WH). The HIA will be aligned to the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context developed by UNESCO and the Advisory Bodies, and will be shared upon completion;
  • The BSC is following up with all church denominations seeking the construction of new churches to ensure compliance with the construction guidelines and take into consideration the comments of the World Heritage Committee and Advisory Bodies. The BSC gives assurances that any proposal will fulfil the requirements of the guidelines, present a HIA, and take account of World Heritage Committee and Advisory Body comments before approval is given;
  • Brief information is provided on the conservation of a range of attributes, rehabilitation of visitor facilities, development of documents concerning management and tour guides, and capacity building.

In September 2021, the State Party submitted an amended design for the Saint Maroun Maronite Church, previously commented on in a Technical Review by ICOMOS in March 2021, to the World Heritage Centre for review. The Technical Review of January 2022 concluded that, in the absence of the various documents referred to above (namely the Management Plan, the Master Plan, the HIA, and visual landscape assessment work, the proposal’s potential impact on OUV could not be assessed at this stage.

On 16 May 2023, the World Heritage Centre received information from the State Party, expressing concerns regarding “heavy structures being built opposite the property, that cause negative visual impact on the site”.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2023

The submission of an Updated Earthquake Response Preparation Plan and a Guidance of Flash Flood Response Plan is noted, as is the ongoing revision of the Management Plan to reflect the adopted Statement of OUV and other matters that have changed since the plan was first developed, all of which address the Committee’s requests. It would be important to integrate the updated Earthquake Response Preparation Plan, and Guidance of Flash Flood Response Plan in the updated Management Plan, and submit its draft to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies.

The Design and Construction Guidelines for New Churches is currently under revision by the State Party, and in this respect, it is recommended to consider their strengthening in establishing measurable standards for new design and sensitive integration into the ‘wilderness’ environment of the site, and to submit the revised guidelines to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies.

The work to define the boundaries for the Baptism Site Nature Reserve is welcomed. It is recommended that the Committee seek further insight into whether this process will include visual landscape analysis to assess potential impacts of the development areas on the nature reserve, as previously requested by the Committee, which would contribute to the integration of the ‘wilderness’ environment in the revision of the Design and Construction Guidelines for New Churches.

While the review of the Master plan has also been initiated, it is not yet clear how the planning of the new ‘Baptism Development Zone’ (BDZ) relates to the development of the overall Master Plan for property and buffer zone. Annex 3 of the State Party’s report proposes substantial development that would appear to pre-empt the systematic development and review of the Master Plan for the buffer zone. It is noted that the location and scale of the pilgrimage village has moved closer to the property boundary, and the village and agricultural land area has substantially expanded compared to the plans provided in the 2018 state of conservation report.

It is recommended that the Committee seek clarification of the master planning process in relation to the BDZ, request counsel as to how its objectives, in particular the establishment of a substantial village complex adjacent to the property boundary, satisfy the purpose of the buffer zone in protecting the OUV of the property, and why this major development is planned within the buffer zone and not beyond. The submission of the finalised draft Master Plan to the World Heritage Centre for consideration by Advisory Bodies is requested.

The development of the revised HIA to address completed and new building development in the buffer zone, requested by the Committee, is welcomed, and its modelling in conformity with the new Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context is noted. The application of the HIA to the proposed development within the BDZ is a critical step before further development of the BDZ planning by the State Party. Similarly, the State Party has indicated that the HIA will guide further proposals for developments in the modern churches zone. The submission of the draft revised HIA, as requested by the Committee, is keenly anticipated.

The State Party’s efforts to continue reporting on developments across the Jordan River, beyond the property boundaries are acknowledged. Moreover, the information provided by the State Party on the conservation of a range of attributes, rehabilitation of visitor facilities, development of management documentation, and capacity building demonstrates ongoing improvement in the protection of OUV and the management of the property.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2023
45 COM 7B.140
Baptism Site “Bethany Beyond the Jordan” (Al-Maghtas) (Jordan) (C 1446)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2,
  2. Recalling Decisions 39 COM 8B.10, 40 COM 8B.50, 41 COM 7B.79, 43 COM 7B.46 and 44 COM 7B.128 adopted at its 39th (Bonn, 2015), 40th (Istanbul, 2016), 41st (Krakow, 2017), 43rd (Baku, 2019), and extended 44th (Fuzhou/online, 2021) sessions respectively,
  3. Commends the State Party on the development of the updated Earthquake Response Preparation Plan, and Guidance of Flash Flood Response Plan;
  4. Welcomes the State Party’s efforts to update the Management Plan to reflect the adopted Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), as well as other matters that have changed since the plan was first developed, and awaits submission of the revised draft, integrating the updated Earthquake Response Preparation Plan, and Guidance of Flash Flood Response Plan;
  5. Takes notes of the ongoing revision of the Design and Construction Guidelines for New Churches in the Buffer Zone, and requests the State Party to consider strengthening measurable standards for new design and sensitive integration into the ‘wilderness’ environment of the property, and to submit the revised guidelines to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  6. Also welcomes the State Party’s efforts to define the boundaries for the Baptism Site Nature Reserve, however, reiterates the need to consider undertaking a visual landscape analysis of the potential impacts on the Jordan River landscape area (the nature reserve) of various development options for the new churches, and accordingly to clarify the integration of the ‘wilderness’ environment in the revision of the Design and Construction Guidelines for New Churches;
  7. Also takes note of the ongoing revision of the Master Plan, and also requests the State Party to submit the Master Plan for the whole buffer zone when completed, to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  8. Further requests the State Party to clarify how the master planning process will relate to the planning of the Baptism Development Zone (BDZ), including the establishment of a pilgrimage village complex adjacent to the property boundary and within the buffer zone, and how the objectives of the BDZ satisfy the purpose of the buffer zone in protecting the OUV of the property;
  9. Further welcomes the State Party’s efforts to progress in the development of the revised Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for completed and new buildings in the buffer zone, in line with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context, and urges the State Party to apply the revised HIA to the planning and proposed developments within the BDZ, and to submit the HIA to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, as a critical step before any development proceeds;
  10. Welcomes furthermore the State Party’s action on the conservation of a range of attributes, rehabilitation of visitor facilities, development of documentation concerning management and tour guides, and capacity building, demonstrating ongoing improvement in the protection of OUV and the management of the property;
  11. Welcomes again the State Party’s efforts to report on developments across the Jordan River, beyond the property boundaries, and reiterates the need to ensure the preservation of important vistas and views by all concerned parties;
  12. Requests furthermore the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session.
Draft Decision: 45 COM 7B.140

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2,
  2. Recalling Decisions 39 COM 8B.10, 40 COM 8B.50, 41 COM 7B.79, 43 COM 7B.46, 44 COM 7B.128 adopted at its 39th (Bonn, 2015), 40th (Istanbul, 2016), 41st (Krakow, 2017), 43rd (Baku, 2019), and extended 44th (Fuzhou/online, 2021) sessions respectively,
  3. Commends the State Party on the development of the updated Earthquake Response Preparation Plan, and Guidance of Flash Flood Response Plan;
  4. Welcomes the State Party’s efforts to update the Management Plan to reflect the adopted Statement of Outstanding Universal Value (OUV), as well as other matters that have changed since the plan was first developed, and awaits submission of the revised draft, integrating the updated Earthquake Response Preparation Plan, and Guidance of Flash Flood Response Plan;
  5. Takes notes of the ongoingrevision of the Design and Construction Guidelines for New Churches in the Buffer Zone, and requests the State Party to consider strengthening measurable standards for new design and sensitive integration into the ‘wilderness’ environment of the property, and to submit the revised guidelines to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  6. Also welcomes the State Party’s efforts to define the boundaries for the Baptism Site Nature Reserve, however, reiterates the need to consider undertaking a visual landscape analysis of the potential impacts on the Jordan River landscape area (the nature reserve) of various development options for the new churches, and accordingly to clarify the integration of the ‘wilderness’ environment in the revision of the Design and Construction Guidelines for New Churches;
  7. Also takes note of the ongoing revision of the Master Plan, and also requests the State Party to submit the Master Plan for the whole buffer zone when completed, to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  8. Further requests the State Party to clarify how the master planning process will relate to the planning of the Baptism Development Zone (BDZ), including the establishment of a pilgrimage village complex adjacent to the property boundary and within the buffer zone, and how the objectives of the BDZ satisfy the purpose of the buffer zone in protecting the OUV of the property;
  9. Further welcomes the State Party’s efforts to progress in the development of the revised Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for completed and new buildings in the buffer zone, in line with the new Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage Context, and urges the State Party to apply the revised HIA to the planning and proposed developments within the BDZ, and to submit the HIA to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies, as a critical step before any development proceeds;
  10. Welcomes furthermore the State Party’s action on the conservation of a range of attributes, rehabilitation of visitor facilities, development of documentation concerning management and tour guides, and capacity building, demonstrating ongoing improvement in the protection of OUV and the management of the property;
  11. Welcomes again the State Party’s efforts to report on developments across the Jordan River, beyond the property boundaries, and reiterates the need to ensure the preservation of important vistas and views by all concerned parties;
  12. Requests furthermore the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session.

Report year: 2023
Jordan
Date of Inscription: 2015
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iii)(vi)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2022) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 45COM (2023)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top