Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Itchan Kala

Uzbekistan
Factors affecting the property in 2023*
  • Management activities
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Management activities
  • Restoration works conducted using non-traditional building material (issue resolved)
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2023

Total amount granted: 2019: USD43,115 UNESCO/Netherlands Funds-in-Trust project for Building capacity in managing World Heritage properties, interconnection of development and heritage preservation in Uzbekistan

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2023
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2023**

1998: ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission; April 2018: ICOMOS Advisory mission

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2023

On 31 January 2022, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/543/documents/ and sets out progress with several issues highlighted by the Committee at its previous sessions, as follows:

  • The Master Plan and the overarching Project of Detailed Planning of Historical Centre of Khiva (PDP) are reported to be implemented within the framework of the ‘Programme for integrated development of tourism potential of Khiva and Khoresm region’, and its associated Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) is underway and will be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review;
  • Amendments to the Management Plan to include measures that encompass the historic urban environment for both the property and its proposed buffer zone are under review and will be submitted to the World Heritage Centre;
  • The moratorium on demolition and reconstruction in Dishan Kala is still in place;
  • The conservation of distinctive traditional architecture will be addressed by measures in the PDP, the Master Plan and the Management Plan, while proposals for the rehabilitation of destroyed mahallas in Dishan Kala will be reflected in the Master Plan and PDP;
  • Several initiatives supported by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) are outlined, such as an Integrated Cultural Heritage Framework (ICHF) to diversify tourist routes and activities. This includes ‘transformative project proposals’ for the central area of the property such as the Itchan Kala public space upgrade, Mahalla upgrade, and a detailed masterplan for mixed use development to diversify the tourist routes and activities in Khiva and in Khorezm Region;
  • The inaugural meeting of the International Advisory Committee (IAC) took place in 2021;
  • Conservation challenges are highlighted, such as addressing termite damage to structural timbers in old structures, including the Khan’s palace, and deterioration of ceramic tiles as a result of salinity in walls.

In April 2021, the State Party submitted a consultant’s report on the proposed way forward for the revision of the PDP. Attached to this were a presentation on the historical development of Khiva, an analysis of its buildings and urban form, and proposed plans for new residential developments within certain areas of the property and its buffer zone. ICOMOS’ February 2022 Technical Review of the report has been presented to the State Party..

In October 2022, the State Party submitted revised documentation for the Mevaston Hotel project and in April 2023 an additional design document, both in response to an ICOMOS Technical Review of 2021, following which ICOMOS submitted a second Technical Review in June 2023.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2023

The State Party’s confirmation that the moratorium on demolition and reconstruction within Dishan Kala, the outer city beyond the boundaries, shall remain in place until the PDP and the Master Plan have been reviewed and approved by the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies and the proposed buffer zone has been approved by the World Heritage Committee, in line with Decision 40 COM 8B.42, is welcome.

The State Party reports that work is progressing on the revision of the PDP, taking into account the recommendations of the Committee, but the final draft revised PDP has yet to be submitted, despite the fact that the consultant’s draft report of April 2021 presented a detailed way forward for parts of this revision. The presentation annexed to the State Party’s report contains information on the history and analysis of the property and its proposed buffer zone to cover Dishan Kala as well as proposed plans for redevelopment, which appear to be proposing complete redevelopment of certain neighbourhoods. However, as this presentation did not include any descriptive text or explanation, it is not possible to understand the status of these proposals.

Dialogue has not yet been initiated by the State Party in relation to the request for a phased dialogue with the Advisory Bodies to support the development of a revised PDP. Instead, reference is made to the IAC, which had its inaugural meeting in September 2021 and the first technical session took place in July 2022. The role of the IAC is clarified by its Mission Statement, adopted by the session of July 2022. The Committee may wish to welcome the launch of the IAC in September 2021 for the World Heritage properties in Uzbekistan and the organisation of its first technical session in July 2022, for which the contribution of the late leading expert Dr Michael Jansen, should be deeply thanked. The Committee may also emphasize that this mechanism should continue advising the national authorities on the conservation of cultural heritage properties and the implementation of Committee decisions and previous mission recommendations, with a reviewed membership.

In relation to tourism development, no reference is made to the development of a Tourism Destination Management Plan, though the State Party refers to the “Programme for integrated development of tourism potential of Khiva and Khoresm region” and indicates that the high-speed rail link to Bukhara and Samarkand was constructed, but not yet launched due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The transformative project proposals for the central area of Khiva included in the ICHF includes a mahalla upgrade, which is said to relate to two mahallas, one of which is in Dishan Kala, where the houses have been totally demolished. It would be helpful to understand how these projects’ relevance and appropriateness are being evaluated, especially in view of the current moratorium on demolition and reconstruction.

The ICHF also includes a concept plan for infrastructure improvements in the city of Khiva and a project to assess links between infrastructure development and tourism growth. All these development projects highlight the urgent need to complete and gain approval for the PDP, so that it may act as a regulative framework for these extensive and important projects.

Although it is reported that the draft Management Plan is being reviewed, might be considered during the next IAC meeting, and will subsequently be submitted for consideration to the World Heritage Centre, no update is provided on the establishment of a Property Management Unit or the appointment of a Property Manager. The Committee may wish to welcome the launch of the International Advisory Committee (IAC) in September 2021 for the World Heritage properties in Uzbekistan and emphasize that this mechanism should advise the national authorities on the conservation of cultural heritage properties and the implementation of Committee decisions and previous missions’ recommendations. Its recommendations on Khiva, concerning the buffer zone boundaries, PDP preparation, land management in mahalla areas and moratorium on the demolition and modification to the townscape should be considered.

To reinforce the management of the property in the context of its urban environment, it is recommended that the Committee urge the State Party to submit the proposed buffer zone for review by the Advisory Bodies and subsequent approval by the Committee, in line with Decision 40 COM 8B.42.

The State Party highlights the ongoing problem of termite attacks on wooden beams, notably in the Friday Mosque and the Khan's Palace, and of the negative consequences of salinity in the walls of monuments. If termites are widespread within the property, and since they have been the stated reason for the demolition of some vernacular structures, there is an urgent need to develop an overall conservation approach to set out how damage might be prevented and controlled before new projects are being developed. The same applies to salinity issues and their impact on ceramic tiles. In conclusion, it is reassuring to note that progress is being made with the revision of both the PDP and the Management Plan, although no timeframe has been presented and no dialogue initiated so far to accompany these processes. The context within which this work is being undertaken is clearly dynamic and fast moving, as illustrated by the range of projects on tourism and infrastructure that are being supported by the EBRD. Therefore, it is urgent to make progress with these planning documents, that should align with the 2011 Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL), in order not to hold up other initiatives. Meanwhile, it is essential to strictly maintain the moratorium on demolition and reconstruction, put in place a Management Unit for the property, and appoint a Property Manager to strengthen management structures and support the approval of a buffer zone. Until these overall structures are in place, the property remains extremely vulnerable.

Construction of phase I of the Mevaston Hotel in Dishan Kala on areas of demolished mahallas had started before the moratorium was in place and documentation had been submitted. The revised plans for phases I and II have been reviewed by ICOMOS. These address the recommendations of the first ICOMOS Technical Review and overall can be considered acceptable, subject to certain detailed conditions. But support in principle for this project should not be seen as justifying the destruction of а historic neighborhood to make way for а hotel complex.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2023
45 COM 7B.49
Itchan Kala (Uzbekistan) (C 543)
Decision: 45 COM 7B.49

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.39 adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Welcomes the fact that the moratorium on demolition and rebuilding in Dishan Kala remains in place;
  4. Notes that the Project of Detailed Planning of Historical Centre of Khiva (PDP) is being revised to take its recommendations into account, but that the requested phased dialogue with the Advisory Bodies has not yet taken place, and urges the State Party to initiate such a dialogue as soon as possible;
  5. Also welcomes the creation of the International Advisory Committee (IAC) for cultural World Heritage properties in Uzbekistan and the organisation of its first technical session in July 2022, and emphasizes that such a mechanism should continue, with the support of its experts, advising the national authorities on the conservation of cultural heritage properties and implementation of Committee decisions and previous missions’ recommendations, as well as the recommendations of the July session of the IAC on Khiva;
  6. Takes note of the details provided on projects supported by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), including the Integrated Cultural Heritage Framework (ICHF) to diversify tourist routes and activities, develop concept plans for infrastructure improvements in the city of Khiva, and assess links between infrastructure development and tourism growth, but expresses concern that these projects are being taken forward before the revised PDP is reviewed and approved by the Committee, and requests the State Party to ensure that full details of projects relating to the property or its immediate setting are submitted together with a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before any commitments are made;
  7. Further notes that the Management Plan is being revised and will be submitted to the World Heritage Centre, also expresses concern that, in the absence of an approved PDP and Management Plan, and without a functioning Property Management Unit and Property Manager, the property remains highly vulnerable in the context of the dynamic and fast-moving tourism and infrastructure projects supported by the EBRD, and also urges the State Party to:
    1. Make progress with the PDP and Management Plans as soon as possible to set a framework for the development of EBRD-supported projects, so that they respect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property and align with the 2011 Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL),
    2. Strengthen the management of the property by appointing a Property Manager and creating a Property Management Unit,
    3. Submit the buffer zone for review by the Advisory Bodies and subsequent approval by the Committee, in line with Decision 40 COM 8B.42;
  8. Also takes notes of conservation problems relating to termite attacks on wooden beams, notably in the Friday Mosque and the Khan's Palace, and of the adverse impact of salinity in walls on ceramic tiles, and also requests the State Party to develop, on the basis of expert advice, overall conservation approaches for both these issues that include preventative and reactive measures, before specific projects are defined and submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  9. Reiterates its regret that the development of phase I of the Mevaston Hotel occurred before proposals and plans were approved and considers that the revised plans for phases I and II are acceptable provided certain detailed conditions are fulfilled, but maintains its view that this project cannot be taken as a model for development in areas of demolished mahallas;
  10. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 46th session.
Draft Decision: 45 COM 7B.49

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add.2,
  2. Recalling Decision 44 COM 7B.39, adopted at its extended 44th session (Fuzhou/online, 2021),
  3. Welcomes the fact that the moratorium on demolition and rebuilding in Dishan Kala remains in place;
  4. Notes that the Project of Detailed Planning of Historical Centre of Khiva (PDP) is being revised to take its recommendations into account, but that the requested phased dialogue with the Advisory Bodies has not yet taken place, and urges the State Party to initiate such a dialogue as soon as possible;
  5. Also welcomes the creation of the International Advisory Committee (IAC) for cultural World Heritage properties in Uzbekistan and the organisation of its first technical session in July 2022, and emphasizes that such a mechanism should continue, with the support of its experts, advising the national authorities on the conservation of cultural heritage properties and implementation of Committee decisions and previous missions’ recommendations, as well as the recommendations of the July session of the IAC on Khiva;
  6. Takes note of the details provided on projects supported by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), including the Integrated Cultural Heritage Framework (ICHF) to diversify tourist routes and activities, develop concept plans for infrastructure improvements in the city of Khiva, and assess links between infrastructure development and tourism growth, but expresses concern that these projects are being taken forward before the revised PDP is reviewed and approved by the Committee, and requests the State Party to ensure that full details of projects relating to the property or its immediate setting are submitted together with a Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies before any commitments are made;
  7. Further notes that the Management Plan is being revised and will be submitted to the World Heritage Centre, also expresses concern that, in the absence of an approved PDP and Management Plan, and without a functioning Property Management Unit and Property Manager, the property remains highly vulnerable in the context of the dynamic and fast-moving tourism and infrastructure projects supported by the EBRD, and also urges the State Party to:
    1. Make progress with the PDP and Management Plans as soon as possible to set a framework for the development of EBRD-supported projects, so that they respect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property and align with the 2011 Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape (HUL),
    2. Strengthen the management of the property by appointing a Property Manager and creating a Property Management Unit,
    3. Submit the buffer zone for review by the Advisory Bodies and subsequent approval by the Committee, in line with Decision 40 COM 8B.42;
  8. Also takes notes of conservation problems relating to termite attacks on wooden beams, notably in the Friday Mosque and the Khan's Palace, and of the adverse impact of salinity in walls on ceramic tiles, and also requests the State Party to develop, on the basis of expert advice, overall conservation approaches for both these issues that include preventative and reactive measures, before specific projects are defined and submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  9. Reiterates its regret that the development of phase I of the Mevaston Hotel occurred before proposals and plans were approved and considers that the revised plans for phases I and II are acceptable provided certain detailed conditions are fulfilled, but maintains its view that this project cannot be taken as a model for development in areas of demolished mahallas;
  10. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2024, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 46th session.

Report year: 2023
Uzbekistan
Date of Inscription: 1990
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iii)(iv)(v)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2022) .pdf
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
arrow_circle_right 45COM (2023)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top