Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex

Thailand
Factors affecting the property in 2021*
  • Ground transport infrastructure
  • Illegal activities
  • Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation
  • Land conversion
  • Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Water infrastructure
  • Other Threats:

    Forest fragmentation / Need for ecological corridors

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Illegal activities (Poaching and illegal logging)
  • Ground transport infrastructure (Road expansion, in particular regarding Highway 304)
  • Land conversion (Encroachment)
  • Management systems/management plan
  • Impacts of tourism/visitor/recreation
  • Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
  • Water infrastructure (Dams)
  • Livestock farming/grazing of domesticated animals (Cattle grazing) (issue resolved)
  • Other threats: Forest fragmentation (connectivity and the need for ecological corridors)
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2021
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2021

On 1 February 2018 and 29 November 2019, the State Party submitted updated reports on the state of conservation of the property. The summaries of both reports are available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/590/documents/. The State Party reports as follows:

  • Efforts to further enhance international cooperation on addressing illegal logging and trade of Siamese Rosewood and other endangered wildlife species have continued amongst the ASEAN countries and through CITES. Cooperation with Cambodia has also continued to strengthen the management of the transboundary landscape, and a joint Action Plan on Protected Areas and Transboundary Biodiversity Conservation Landscape Management (2019-2022) was approved in April 2019. A Joint Ranger Training Course on Transboundary Enforcement took place in August 2019;
  • The implementation of the Action Plan to Prevent and Suppress Illegal Logging and Trade of Siamese Rosewood in Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex 2014-2019 has resulted in a significant decline in reported criminal cases, from 642 in 2014 to 29 in 2019 (up to September). There has been no report of illegal logging of other species to substitute for Siamese Rosewood. SMART patrols have been intensified, resulting in 90% coverage of the property in 2019 and the installation of 126 camera traps to date. The use of GPS trackers on Siamese Rosewood timbers has assisted in some of the criminal cases. The State Party has committed to host and fund a workshop to draft the next Action Plan;
  • No new case of resort development has been recorded inside the property. For better protection of natural resources within the property and other protected areas, amendments to the National Park Act and the Wildlife Protection and Reservation Act are being made, which would encourage greater community participation in protected area management;
  • The expansion of Highway 304 and its associated forest corridors for wildlife between Khao Yai and Thap Lan National Parks was completed in March 2019, with the exception of a section where a vehicle bridge and wildlife underpass are still under construction;
  • Mitigation measures for the Huay Samong Dam are continuing to be implemented, including enhanced water patrols and the creation of a new ranger station, forest rehabilitation around the reservoir, and the establishment of a Network Centric Anti-Poaching System (NCAPS);
  • On 19 September 2017, the Thai Cabinet passed a resolution to halt the expansion of Highway 348 and seek alternative options, and gave instructions to its Government Ministries to review the necessity and suitability of constructing dams and reservoirs inside the property. The Lam Prayathan dam project inside the property was cancelled as a result of a feasibility study and the results of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA).
  • On 26 June 2020, the World Heritage Centre requested clarification from the State Party on renewed plans for the development of several dams within and near the property. In a letter submitted on 11 January 2021, the State Party replied that none of the seven indicated dams had yet been approved, and that EIAs, which would include assessments of alternative options, were still ongoing.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2021

The State Party’s continued active leadership in enhancing international cooperation to address the illegal logging and trade of Siamese Rosewood is commendable. The transboundary landscape initiative with Cambodia that extends beyond the boundaries of the property is also a vital effort to tackle illegal traffickers that operate transnationally.

The report on the implementation of the 2014-2019 Action Plan indicates that the use of varying technologies and strengthened patrol efforts has successfully resulted in a considerable reduction in the number of reported cases of illegal Siamese Rosewood logging. These efforts are welcomed and point to an improved situation regarding Siamese Rosewood and other valuable timber species. However, it is important to reiterate that this indicator is not necessarily reflecting a true reduction in illegal logging, as other factors need to be considered, such as the detection rate of illegal logging incidents. Therefore, the 2016 mission recommendation to redefine the indicators of the Action Plan, ensuring adequate means of verification to accurately and fully measure the plan’s effectiveness, should be reiterated.

Taking into consideration the significant efforts to curb the illegal trade since 2017, and based on available data, the World Heritage Centre and IUCN consider that the inclusion of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger is not warranted at present. This will require reassessment if there is evidence that the situation regarding illegal logging deteriorates further or that other valuable species start to be targeted by logging or poaching. The State Party’s commitment to develop a new joint Action Plan on Protected Areas and Transboundary Biodiversity Conservation Landscape Management (2019-2022) in cooperation with Cambodia and other international partners is appreciated, and it is important to ensure that the current cooperative efforts are sustained.

The assurance that no new resort development has taken place in the property is welcomed. The ongoing process to amend legislation to acknowledge and accommodate community involvement has the potential to raise awareness and empower communities for site management. However, it will be important to ensure that this will not lead to new encroachments, and therefore a close monitoring of how this new legislation may affect the integrity of the property will be required.

The continued efforts to mitigate the impacts of the expansion of Highway 304, its associated forest corridors and Huay Samong Dam are appreciated. The State Party should ensure that mitigation measures and monitoring continue beyond the construction phase, to be sure that the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) is not negatively impacted.

The suspension of further expansion of Highway 348 and the commitment to seeking alternative options are welcomed. The additional Cabinet instructions pertaining to new dams and the State Party’s decision not to continue the Lam Prayathan dam project in view of its potential negative impacts on the OUV of the property are appreciated. However, third-party information verified by the State Party indicates that this dam is still being considered among six other dams that are currently undergoing EIAs. Noting that all seven dams would be positioned within the property, and recalling that the Committee, in its Decision 41 COM 7B.32, had requested the State Party to permanently cancel plans for any construction of dams with reservoirs inside the property boundaries, it is of significant concern that the active plans are being considered via EIA processes. With increasing pressure for development, combined with climate change impacts and the cumulative impacts from the currently operating dams within and in the vicinity of the property, it is recommended that the Committee request the State Party to undertake a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the river basin including the property, in accordance with the IUCN World Heritage Advice Note on Environmental Assessment, to inform management and future development proposals at the basin level. It is further recommended that the Committee urge the State Party to cancel any consideration for the construction of new dams within the property, in line with previous decisions, and to suspend the specific assessment of projects in the wider basin that could impact the property’s OUV until the SEA has been completed and reviewed by the World Heritage Centre and IUCN.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2021
44 COM 7B.97
Dong Phayayen-Khao-Yai Forest Complex (Thailand) (N 590rev)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decisions 40 COM 7B.90 and 41 COM 7B.32, adopted at its 40th (Istanbul/UNESCO, 2016) and 41st (Krakow, 2017) sessions respectively,
  3. Commends the State Party for its continued active leadership in enhancing international cooperation on illegal logging and trade of Siamese Rosewood;
  4. Notes with satisfaction that the implementation of the Action Plan to Prevent and Suppress Illegal Logging and Trade of Siamese Rosewood in Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex 2014-2019 has reportedly resulted in a reduction of recorded cases relating to the illegal logging of Siamese Rosewood;
  5. Requests the State Party to redefine the indicators for the Action Plan, ensuring adequate means of verification to accurately measure the effectiveness of its implementation, as per the recommendations of the 2016 Reactive Monitoring mission;
  6. Appreciates the State Party’s commitment to develop a new joint Action Plan on Protected Areas and Transboundary Biodiversity Conservation Landscape Management (2019-2022) in cooperation with Cambodia and other international partners, and encourages the States Parties to ensure that the current cooperative efforts are sustained;
  7. Also notes with satisfaction that no new case of resort development has been recorded inside the property, and that the process to amend the National Park Act and the Wildlife Protection and Reservation Act has been initiated to improve community participation in protected area management, and also requests the State Party to closely monitor how this new legislation may affect the integrity of the property and ensure that appropriate measures are taken to continue preventing any illegal encroachment within the property;
  8. Further notes with satisfaction the State Party’s continued commitment and efforts to avoid any negative impact on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property from the ongoing expansion of Highway 304 and the construction of the Huay Samong Dam, and further requests the State Party to ensure that the mitigation measures and monitoring of impacts continue in the post-construction phase to mitigate any adverse impact on the property’s OUV;
  9. Welcomes the Cabinet resolution to halt the further expansion of Highway 348 and seek alternative options to review the necessity and suitability of constructing dams and reservoirs inside the property and to cancel the Lam Prayathan dam project in view of potential negative impacts on the OUV of the property, but notes with utmost concern reports of the renewed development of several dam projects within and adjacent to the property, and reiterates its request to the State Party to permanently cancel plans for any construction of dams with reservoirs inside the property’s boundaries;
  10. Requests furthermore the State Party to undertake a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the river basin, including the property, to inform management and future development proposals at the basin level, and that any proposals for dam projects around the property that may impact on its OUV be suspended until the SEA has been completed and reviewed by the World Heritage Centre and IUCN;
  11. Requests furthermore the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session.
Draft Decision: 44 COM 7B.97

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decisions 40 COM 7B.90 and 41 COM 7B.32, adopted at its 40th (Doha, 2016) and 41st (Krakow, 2017) sessions respectively,
  3. Commends the State Party for its continued active leadership in enhancing international cooperation on illegal logging and trade of Siamese Rosewood;
  4. Notes with satisfaction that the implementation of the Action Plan to Prevent and Suppress Illegal Logging and Trade of Siamese Rosewood in Dong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex 2014-2019 has reportedly resulted in a reduction of recorded cases relating to the illegal logging of Siamese Rosewood;
  5. Requests the State Party to redefine the indicators for the Action Plan, ensuring adequate means of verification to accurately measure the effectiveness of its implementation, as per the recommendations of the 2016 Reactive Monitoring mission;
  6. Appreciates the State Party’s commitment to develop a new joint Action Plan on Protected Areas and Transboundary Biodiversity Conservation Landscape Management (2019-2022) in cooperation with Cambodia and other international partners, and encourages the States Parties to ensure that the current cooperative efforts are sustained;
  7. Also notes with satisfaction that no new case of resort development has been recorded inside the property, and that the process to amend the National Park Act and the Wildlife Protection and Reservation Act has been initiated to improve community participation in protected area management, and also requests the State Party to closely monitor how this new legislation may affect the integrity of the property and ensure that appropriate measures are taken to continue preventing any illegal encroachment within the property;
  8. Further notes with satisfaction the State Party’s continued commitment and efforts to avoid any negative impact on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property from the ongoing expansion of Highway 304 and the construction of the Huay Samong Dam, and further requests the State Party to ensure that the mitigation measures and monitoring of impacts continue in the post-construction phase to mitigate any adverse impact on the property’s OUV;
  9. Welcomes the Cabinet resolution to halt the further expansion of Highway 348 and seek alternative options to review the necessity and suitability of constructing dams and reservoirs inside the property and to cancel the Lam Prayathan dam project in view of potential negative impacts on the OUV of the property, but notes with utmost concern reports of the renewed development of several dam projects within and adjacent to the property, and reiterates its request to the State Party to permanently cancel plans for any construction of dams with reservoirs inside the property’s boundaries;
  10. Requests furthermore the State Party to undertake a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the river basin, including the property, to inform management and future development proposals at the basin level, and that any proposals for dam projects around the property that may impact on its OUV be suspended until the SEA has been completed and reviewed by the World Heritage Centre and IUCN;
  11. Requests furthermore the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session in 2022.
Report year: 2021
Thailand
Date of Inscription: 2005
Category: Natural
Criteria: (x)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2019) .pdf
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
arrow_circle_right 44COM (2021)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top