Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Okavango Delta

Botswana
Factors affecting the property in 2021*
  • Governance
  • Invasive / alien freshwater species
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Mining
  • Other Threats:

    Animal sanitation and diseases; Transboundary management of water resources

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Transboundary management of water resources
  • Lack of wildlife monitoring programme
  • Animal sanitation and diseases
  • Mining exploration licenses overlapping with the buffer zone
  • Management and governance
  • Engagement of local communities and indigenous peoples
  • Alien invasive species
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2021

Total amount granted to the property: USD 150,000 from the Flanders Funds-in-Trust (2017-2021) for the community management of protected areas for conservation (COMPACT) programme in cooperation with the UNDP GEF Small Grants Programme. Further support through the Flanders Funds-in-Trust (2019-2022) to the States Parties of Botswana, Angola and Namibia to examine the feasibility of a transboundary extension of the property.

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2021
Requests approved: 1 (from 2017-2017)
Total amount approved : 27,080 USD
Missions to the property until 2021**
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2021

On 23 March 2020, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1432/documents/, reporting the following:

  • Exploration activities close to the buffer zone are being monitored;
  • The Permanent Okavango River Basin Water Commission (OKACOM) is conducting a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of the Cubango-Okavango River Basin (CORB), with a basin-wide Environmental Monitoring Framework and hydro-meteorological, water quality, environmental and biodiversity surveys;
  • A Community Based Natural Resource Management Strategy was developed to accommodate traditional resource use for livelihoods and increase local access to tourism opportunities;
  • An analysis of the 2019 aerial wildlife surveys will be submitted to the World Heritage Centre once available;
  • Hydrological monitoring data show that 2018/19 was the driest year since 1981 because of low rainfall in the region. For 2019/20, an improvement was expected due to exceptional rainfall at the source in the Angolan highlands;
  • Biological methods used to control the invasive species Salvinia molesta with local stakeholders seem to be successful;
  • Ten out of 15 wastewater-generating facilities were non-compliant with national wastewater pollution standards and using disposal methods not permitted in Wildlife Management Areas. Nevertheless, monitoring shows that water quality in the delta is good;
  • An audit of the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) of the cable-stayed bridge and associated approach road at Mohembo was conducted and observed numerous non-conformities.

The draft Okavango Delta Management Plan (ODMP) was submitted by the State Party on 13 April 2021.

With support from Flanders (Belgium), the State Party has convened a steering committee to review the feasibility of an extension of the property in cooperation with the States Parties of Angola and Namibia. An Action Plan was agreed but its implementation has been delayed because of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Letters of exchanges between the World Heritage Centre and the States Parties of Botswana and Namibia in November 2020 clarified that oil exploration activities were approved in northeastern Namibia and northwestern Botswana within the Okavango river basin, but that the license excluded the Tsodilo World Heritage property (Botswana), and the EIA for the drilling of multiple stratigraphic test wells was shared. On 1 February 2021, the review of the EIA undertaken by the World Heritage Centre and IUCN was submitted to the State Party of Namibia. The World Heritage Centre received various petitions and letters from civil society, including Indigenous Peoples’ organizations, expressing concern over the project.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2021

The cooperation between the States Parties of Botswana, Angola and Namibia through OKACOM is welcomed, supporting long-term protection of the property. Any development in the Cubango-Okavango River Basin (CORB) leading to unsustainable water abstraction or pollution could impact the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (OUV). The impact of the low rainfall in 2018/19 on water levels in the property demonstrates the importance of a basin-wide approach. The conduct of the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) as requested by the Committee, with a basin-wide Environmental Monitoring Framework, is an important step to achieve this.

The State Party of Botswana’s leadership in exploring the possibility of a transboundary extension of the property is commendable. Inclusion of key areas of the CORB would enhance the current collaborative efforts to protect the property.

The  revision of the ODMP presents an important opportunity to ensure that the protection of the OUV underpins the management objectives and to incorporate traditional resource use for livelihoods, user access rights and cultural rights as requested by the Committee, as well as other protection and management issues. The submitted draft is currently under review by IUCN. Invasive alien plants remain an important threat to the ecological integrity of the property, and control strategies and comprehensive monitoring should be included in the new ODMP. 

It is concerning that no progress was reported on the requested EIA for the veterinary cordon fences as they create a major impediment to wildlife migrations. 

The 2019 aerial wildlife survey results will be important for evaluating whether wildlife populations have been maintained since the previous 2012 survey and should serve as a baseline for establishing a regular monitoring programme of wildlife populations.

The numerous non-conformities observed in the audit of the EMP for the Mohembo bridge project are of concern and it is recommended that the Committee request the State Party to complement the EIA with a specific assessment of the potential impacts of the project on the property’s OUV. Adequate measures are also required to ensure that all wastewater-generating facilities in the property comply with the legislation.

The granting of oil exploration licenses in Botswana and Namibia is of significant concern. While the licensed areas do not overlap with the property or its buffer zone, they are situated in environmentally sensitive areas of CORB, with a potential negative impact on the property in case of spills or pollution. The areas are also important dispersal routes for elephants and other wildlife. While the current activities as described in the planning documents are not likely to have a significant direct impact on the property based on their restricted scope and location away from the property, this might be a first stage towards a larger project with significant risks to the interconnected water system of the delta and the OUV, in case reserves are found. Furthermore, IUCN and the World Heritage Centre identified some gaps and concerns with the EIA, such as the need for a more detailed spatial distribution assessment of species and to ascertain the connectivity of the ecosystems. Therefore, great caution should be applied in proceeding with any stage of this project. Any potential future activities, including further exploration stages such as seismic research and drilling of stratigraphic wells should be evaluated critically, and be subject to an EIA that corresponds with international standards, including an assessment of social impacts and a review of potential impacts on the World Heritage property in line with IUCN’s World Heritage Advice Note on Environmental Assessment.  

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2021
44 COM 7B.80
Okavango Delta (Botswana) (N 1432)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decisions 38 COM 8B.5 and 42 COM 7B.89, adopted at its 38th (Doha, 2014) and 42nd (Manama, 2018) sessions respectively,
  3. Warmly welcomes the increased cooperation between the States Parties of Botswana, Angola and Namibia through the Permanent Okavango River Basin Water Commission (OKACOM), in particular the initiation of the process to conduct a comprehensive Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in order to assess impacts of developments in the Cubango-Okavango River Basin (CORB) at the strategic level and at the landscape scale, as was requested by the Committee, and the development of a basin-wide Environmental Monitoring Framework;
  4. Encourages the States Parties of Angola, Botswana and Namibia on their initiative to review the feasibility of a transboundary or -national extension of the property to include key areas of the CORB, which would contribute to a better protection of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) and in particular the integrity of the property;
  5. Reiterates the importance of an adequate protection of the CORB to ensure the long-term survival of the property and considers that any development in the watershed, which would lead to significant water abstraction or pollution, has a high potential to impact the OUV of the property;
  6. Expresses concern about the granting of oil exploration licenses in environmentally sensitive areas within the Okavango river basin in northwestern Botswana and northeastern Namibia that could result in potential negative impact on the property in case of spills or pollution;
  7. Urges the States Parties of Botswana and Namibia to ensure that potential further steps to develop the oil project, which include the use of new exploration techniques, are subject to rigorous and critical prior review, including through Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that corresponds to international standards, including an assessment of social impacts and a review of potential impacts on the World Heritage property, in line with the IUCN World Heritage Advice Note on Environmental Assessment, and requests that all such assessments are submitted to the World Heritage Centre, for review by IUCN;
  8. Appreciates the efforts to revise the Okavango Delta Management Plan (ODMP) and its submission to the World Heritage Centre, and also requests the State Party to finalise the plan following IUCN’s review;
  9. Also appreciates the on-going efforts to control invasive alien species that threaten the ecological integrity of the property, and further requests the State Party to include control strategies and a comprehensive monitoring plan in the revised ODMP;
  10. Also recalling that veterinary cordon fences create a major impediment to wildlife migrations, expresses its concern that an EIA has not yet been undertaken in this regard, and reiterates its request to the State Party to continue efforts to rationalize veterinary cordon fencing, removing them when possible;
  11. Also reiterates its requests to the State Party to:
    1. Complement the EIA for the Mohembo bridge project with a specific assessment of the potential impacts of the construction and use of the bridge and the road on the property’s OUV, and submit it to the World Heritage Centre for review by IUCN,
    2. Submit the results of the 2019 aerial wildlife surveys to the World Heritage Centre and set up a regular monitoring programme of wildlife populations using the 2019 data as a baseline,
    3. Take measures to ensure that all wastewater generating facilities in the property comply with national wastewater pollution standards and avoid any effluent disposal methods that could impact the OUV of the property, ensuring regular monitoring of water quality;
  12. Requests furthermore the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session.
Draft Decision: 44 COM 7B.80

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decisions 38 COM 8B.5 and 42 COM 7B.89, adopted at its 38th (Doha, 2014) and 42nd (Manama, 2018) sessions respectively,
  3. Warmly welcomes the increased cooperation between the States Parties of Botswana, Angola and Namibia through the Permanent Okavango River Basin Water Commission (OKACOM), in particular the initiation of the process to conduct a comprehensive Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in order to assess impacts of developments in the Cubango-Okavango River Basin (CORB) at the strategic level and at the landscape scale, as was requested by the Committee, and the development of a basin-wide Environmental Monitoring Framework;
  4. Encourages the States Parties of Angola, Botswana and Namibia on their initiative to review the feasibility of a transboundary or -national extension of the property to include key areas of the CORB, which would contribute to a better protection of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) and in particular the integrity of the property;
  5. Reiterates the importance of an adequate protection of the CORB to ensure the long-term survival of the property and considers that any development in the watershed, which would lead to significant water abstraction or pollution, has a high potential to impact the OUV of the property;
  6. Expresses concern about the granting of oil exploration licenses in environmentally sensitive areas within the Okavango river basin in northwestern Botswana and northeastern Namibia that could result in potential negative impact on the property in case of spills or pollution;
  7. Urges the States Parties of Botswana and Namibia to ensure that potential further steps to develop the oil project, which include the use of new exploration techniques, are subject to rigorous and critical prior review, including through Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) that corresponds to international standards, including an assessment of social impacts and a review of potential impacts on the World Heritage property, in line with the IUCN World Heritage Advice Note on Environmental Assessment, and requests that all such assessments are submitted to the World Heritage Centre, for review by IUCN;
  8. Appreciates the efforts to revise the Okavango Delta Management Plan (ODMP) and its submission to the World Heritage Centre, and also requests the State Party to finalise the plan following IUCN’s review;
  9. Also appreciates the on-going efforts to control invasive alien species that threaten the ecological integrity of the property, and further requests the State Party to include control strategies and a comprehensive monitoring plan in the revised ODMP;
  10. Also recalling that veterinary cordon fences create a major impediment to wildlife migrations, expresses its concern that an EIA has not yet been undertaken in this regard, and reiterates its request to the State Party to continue efforts to rationalize veterinary cordon fencing, removing them when possible;
  11. Also reiterates its requests to the State Party to:
    1. Complement the EIA for the Mohembo bridge project with a specific assessment of the potential impacts of the construction and use of the bridge and the road on the property’s OUV, and submit it to the World Heritage Centre for review by IUCN,
    2. Submit the results of the 2019 aerial wildlife surveys to the World Heritage Centre and set up a regular monitoring programme of wildlife populations using the 2019 data as a baseline,
    3. Take measures to ensure that all wastewater generating facilities in the property comply with national wastewater pollution standards and avoid any effluent disposal methods that could impact the OUV of the property, ensuring regular monitoring of water quality;
  12. Requests furthermore the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session in 2022.
Report year: 2021
Botswana
Date of Inscription: 2014
Category: Natural
Criteria: (vii)(ix)(x)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2020) .pdf
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
arrow_circle_right 44COM (2021)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top