Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Gebel Barkal and the Sites of the Napatan Region

Sudan
Factors affecting the property in 2021*
  • Desertification
  • Flooding
  • Ground transport infrastructure
  • Housing
  • Land conversion
  • Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Wind
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Land conversion
  • Deterioration as a result of exposure to difficult environmental conditions such as wind with sand and floods
  • Urban encroachment
  • Absence of a management plan with government commitment
  • Flooding
  • Ground transport infrastructure
  • Housing
  • Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure
  • Management systems / management plan
  • Wind and Desertification
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2021
Total amount provided: USD 38,398 by the UNESCO/ Netherlands Funds-in-Trust for the development of a sustainable tourism plan; USD 19,798 from the Heritage Emergency Fund.
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2021
Requests approved: 3 (from 2004-2021)
Total amount approved : 118,900 USD
Missions to the property until 2021**

2004, 2006, 2007: World Heritage Centre missions; February 2011: World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS/ICCROM Reactive Monitoring mission; February 2019: joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2021

On 14 June 2020, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, an executive summary of which is available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1073/documents/. It provides updated information on progress and challenges in a number of conservation issues addressed by the Committee, as follows:

  • There have been challenges in the implementation of the decisions of the Committee and the recommendations of the 2019 joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission. These are mainly due to the April 2019 revolution in Sudan, which resulted in the appointment of a new transitional government, in addition to the coronavirus pandemic. A new Director-General for the National Corporation for Antiquities and Museums (NCAM) was appointed in February 2020 and a new management structure has been established;
  • Discussions have commenced to address the recommendations concerning boundaries, the creation of a buffer zone and the regulation of ownership of land within and surrounding the components of the property. Potential changes in legislation and regulations are required. NCAM received a grant from the International Alliance for the Protection of Heritage in Conflict Areas (ALIPH) to survey the boundaries of the property;
  • Conservation monitoring has been established at Kurru and a shelter has been installed over the rock-cut temple. The conservation of the pyramids at Gebel Barkal and Nuri will be a priority of NCAM, supported by the archeological missions;
  • Assistance from the international community with resources and training to manage the property is essential, as NCAM relies on international archeological teams to support excavations, management and conservation;
  • Archaeological excavation has occurred at Gebel Barkal, Sanam and Nuri. The backfilling of archeological features at Sanam is expected to take place in the last quarter of 2020;
  • Construction of the entrance building at Kurru has been halted. However, recommendations related to moving Gebel Barkal museum and the adjacent new visitor centre, removing the nearby hotel construction, and building improved tomb covers at Zuma have not been implemented, owing to lack of funding and other constraints;
  • Means to prevent vehicles from accessing the property at Gebel Barkal have been introduced, and vehicle traffic has been stopped in some sites. Further work is required to ensure that vehicles will not be able to enter any of the properties indefinitely;
  • A database for objects in the Gebel Barkal Museum is in preparation, with 500 entries included to date;
  • Revision of the 2007 Management Plan for the site has been proposed, in light of the recent work carried out and the evolving circumstances at the property.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2021

The efforts and commitment of the State Party, despite challenges which have impeded full implementation of the decisions of the Committee and recommendations of the 2019 Reactive Monitoring mission, are appreciated. Moreover, there have been efforts to reform policies and procedures, which if implemented could contribute to enhancing capacity to manage the site.

However, the deterioration of many components continues to have an adverse impact on the authenticity and integrity of the property and to threaten the attributes which convey its OUV. The 2019 mission expressed great concerns about the overall state of conservation of the property and identified the need for urgent further protection measures. The State Party has acknowledged that a number of temples, the Meroitic city and the Pyramids are in a poor general state of conservation with fabric degrading, and impacts from environmental factors such as flash flooding, wind and sand erosion, rising water tables and humidity, are still ongoing. Moreover, rainfall during September 2020, has resulted in flooding of the Blue Nile and posing a potential threat to the property.

Although the State Party has commenced steps to preserve the property such as preventing vehicle entry, additional efforts are required. It is recommended that the Committee continue to express serious concern at the overall state of conservation of the property, which is seriously threatened on various levels, and urge the State Party to implement fully the recommendations of the 2019 mission. Until conservation of the existing archaeological structures is ensured, no new archaeological excavations should occur. The need for more effective coordination of international archaeological missions, which was highlighted in Decision 43 COM 7B.54, remains.

The 2019 mission recommended that the State Party elaborate a 5-year Action Plan to carry out activities to address the management structure and legal instruments, inventory and documentation, conservation and restoration, development and community involvement and tourism management. It is recommended that the Committee urge the State Party to prepare a comprehensive action plan, as required by the mission report, to address these matters. This would be a first step towards the development of an efficient management mechanism and could set the groundwork for future update of the Management Plan.

The halt to construction of the entrance building at Kurru is welcome, but other projects such as moving Gebel Barkal museum and the adjacent new visitor centre, removing hotel construction in the vicinity of the property, and building improved tomb covers at Zuma remain outstanding. In light of the encroaching urbanisation, and potential development projects in the property and buffer zone, it is recommended that the Committee remind the State Party of its obligation to submit prior notifications of major projects, which may affect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines. This would assist in determining those projects which require further consideration through a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) or Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA).

Clarification of the property boundaries and the creation of a buffer zone remain pending. The State Party has acknowledged this challenge and has acquired international support. Discussions are ongoing to develop appropriate regulations. It is recommended that the Committee encourage the State Party to continue its efforts to clarify the boundaries and submit a minor boundary modification for the creation of a buffer zone, as a matter of urgency.

  • A mission was undertaken to Sudan from 2 to 17 November 2020, with the support of the UNESCO Heritage Emergency Fund to assess the impact of the 2020 floods on World Heritage properties and other archeological sites in Sudan. The mission resulted in several recommendations regarding pressing issues, including rising groundwater and flooding at the property. An Emergency Assistance request has been submitted and is currently under review.

In order to improve tourism management, and with the support of the Netherlands Fund-in-Trust, UNESCO in collaboration with NCAM, began the implementation of a project in March 2020, with the objective of developing a sustainable tourism strategy for the property, taking into account the aspirations of the local communities. The collaborative work underway with the local community at Kurru was recommended by the 2019 mission as an example to apply more widely.  

Urgent measures need to be implemented at the property to reverse the alarming level of deterioration. In light of the information provided and the support needed by the State Party, it is recommended that the Committee call on the international community to support the urgent protection and management work required through financial and technical assistance. At its 43rd session the Committee agreed to allow one more year before considering, the possible inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger (Decision: 43 COM 7B.54). In view of the circumstances of the property and particular challenges of the past year, it is also recommended that the Committee allow one further year before consideration of the possible inscription of the property in the List of World Heritage in Danger, in line with Paragraph 179 of the Operational Guidelines.  

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2021
44 COM 7B.17
Gebel Barkal and the Sites of the Napatan Region (Sudan) (C 1073)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 43 COM 7B.54, adopted at its 43rd session (Baku, 2019),
  3. Commends the State Party for its efforts to implement some Committee decisions and the recommendations of the 2019 mission, despite significant challenges;
  4. Continues to express serious concern at the overall state of conservation of the property, which is seriously threatened by alarming levels of fabric degradation as a result of environmental factors, including heavy rainfall and potential flooding, absence of adequate controls, lack of appropriate maintenance, inadequate museum and storage facilities, lack of management planning, ineffective coordination of archaeological missions, absence of an integrated strategy for the conservation of newly-excavated archaeological features, urban encroachment and development projects, all of which are impacting negatively on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property;
  5. Requests the State Party to ensure that no new archaeological excavations occur until conservation of the existing archaeological structures is ensured;
  6. Notes that urgent measures are required at the property to reverse the alarming level of deterioration and also requests the State Party to implement all of the recommendations of the 2019 Reactive Monitoring mission and the 2020 UNESCO Heritage Emergency Fund mission as a matter of urgency;
  7. Reminds the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies, detailed information of any future works that may affect the OUV of the property, in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  8. Urges the State Party to prepare a 5-year comprehensive action plan, as recommended by the monitoring mission to address the management structure, legal instruments, inventories, documentation, conservation, restoration, development, community involvement and tourism management;
  9. Takes note of the State Party’s proposal for a revision of the 2007 Management Plan as appropriate and encourages its eventual elaboration by the State Party;
  10. Also urges the State Party to continue its efforts with regards to defining the boundaries of the property, as a matter of urgency, and also reminds the State Party to submit a Minor Boundary Modification, with property delimitations of the buffer zone in line with Paragraph 164 of the Operational Guidelines;
  11. Welcomes the proposed development of a sustainable tourism strategy with funding support from the Netherlands Funds-in-Trust;
  12. Calls on the international community to support the State Party’s urgent protection and management work through financial and technical assistance;
  13. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session, with a view to considering, in the case of continued ascertained danger to the OUV, in line with Paragraph 179 of the Operational Guidelines, the possible inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Draft Decision: 44 COM 7B.17

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 43 COM 7B.54, adopted at its 43rd session (Baku, 2019),
  3. Commends the State Party for its efforts to implement some Committee decisions and the recommendations of the 2019 mission, despite significant challenges;
  4. Continues to express serious concern at the overall state of conservation of the property, which is seriously threatened by alarming levels of fabric degradation as a result of environmental factors, including heavy rainfall and potential flooding, absence of adequate controls, lack of appropriate maintenance, inadequate museum and storage facilities, lack of management planning, ineffective coordination of archaeological missions, absence of an integrated strategy for the conservation of newly-excavated archaeological features, urban encroachment and development projects, all of which are impacting negatively on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property;
  5. Requests the State Party to ensure that no new archaeological excavations occur until conservation of the existing archaeological structures is ensured;
  6. Notes that urgent measures are required at the property to reverse the alarming level of deterioration and also requests the State Party to implement all of the recommendations of the 2019 Reactive Monitoring mission and the 2020 UNESCO Heritage Emergency Fund mission as a matter of urgency;
  7. Reminds the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, for review by the Advisory Bodies, detailed information of any future works that may affect the OUV of the property, in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  8. Urges the State Party to prepare a 5-year comprehensive action plan, as recommended by the monitoring mission to address the management structure, legal instruments, inventories, documentation, conservation, restoration, development, community involvement and tourism management;
  9. Takes note of the State Party’s proposal for a revision of the 2007 Management Plan as appropriate and encourages its eventual elaboration by the State Party;
  10. Also urges the State Party to continue its efforts with regards to defining the boundaries of the property, as a matter of urgency, and also reminds the State Party to submit a Minor Boundary Modification, with property delimitations of the buffer zone in line with Paragraph 164 of the Operational Guidelines;
  11. Welcomes the proposed development of a sustainable tourism strategy with funding support from the Netherlands Funds-in-Trust;
  12. Calls on the international community to support the State Party’s urgent protection and management work through financial and technical assistance;
  13. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session in 2022, with the view of considering, in the case of continued ascertained danger to the OUV, in line with Paragraph 179 of the Operational Guidelines, the possible inscription of the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2021
Sudan
Date of Inscription: 2003
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(vi)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2020) .pdf
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
arrow_circle_right 44COM (2021)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top