Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Archaeological Site of Sabratha

Libya
Factors affecting the property in 2021*
  • Housing
  • Invasive/alien terrestrial species
  • Land conversion
  • Relative humidity
  • War
  • Other Threats:

    Excessive vegetation growth; Impact of humidity and seawater salt on stone masonry

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Invasive/alien terrestrial species
  • Land conversion
  • Conflict situation prevailing in the country
  • Excessive vegetation growth
  • Natural degradation
  • Urban encroachment
  • Local conditions affecting the physical fabric: Impact of humidity and seawater salt on stone masonry
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
Conflict situation prevailing in the country
Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger

Not yet drafted

Corrective Measures for the property

Not yet identified

Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures

Not yet identified

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2021

Total amount granted: June 2020: Netherlands Funds in Trust: USD 49,620 for Strengthening national capacities for the elaboration of corrective measures for Libyan World Heritage properties.

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2021
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2021**

June 2000: World Heritage Centre mission; March 2003: World Heritage Centre mission; January 2007: Joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission.

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2021

On 6 February 2020, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, an updated version of which was submitted on 11 February 2021. Executive summaries of both reports are available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/184/documents/. Progress in a number of conservation issues addressed by the Committee at its previous session is presented, as follows:

  • The Department of Antiquities (DoA) has continued working with the civil society and no violations were registered;
  • In 2019, a committee was established, as per Government Decision 155/2019, for the Management and Implementation of the Strategy for Preservation and Conservation of World Heritage properties in Libya;
  • The main threats to the property are environmental factors that lead to the degradation of the monuments due to the nature of the building materials;
  • Substantial funding and technical support are required, and the DoA is in the process of securing both;
  • Efforts are being made to control vegetation growth and limit damage to the floor mosaics and monuments. Studies to identify the types of plants to determine the extent of damage were elaborated. A plan is underway for direct control mechanisms. Other conservation, stabilization, and maintenance works were undertaken;
  • Nanotechnology is being considered as a possibility to reduce the effects of weathering and sand drift, other modern technologies are being used to assess the condition of the property;
  • A damage assessment report was prepared for the Roman Theatre, indicating damage at several locations due to armed conflict (minor damage from small arms), the most prominent of which is the visual scarring of some parts. A more detailed and specialized study to plan and implement the restoration is currently being undertaken;
  • In coordination with the Municipality of Sabratha and the United Nations Development Program in Libya (UNDP), a project for restoration and maintenance works has been initiated. It mainly focuses on the modern facilities at the site, and includes restoration works at the Roman Theatre, which will be carried out by specialized staff of the DoA in coordination with the UNDP;
  • A contract has been established to implement the first phase of the 660-metre protection fence, once funding has been secured by the Government of National Accord of Libya;
  • In the framework of the “Training for Action” programme, training activities were carried out for archaeologists, focusing on recording and management, and for the Tourism Police and the Antiquities Protection Authority, on awareness-raising and cultural heritage protection;
  • A minor boundary modification proposal has been submitted and an agreement between DoA and local authorities was signed to protect the buffer zone of the property and regulate urban development in the area;
  • The identification of priorities for the elaboration of the management plan has started;
  • The COVID-19 Pandemic, lack of resources and frequent electricity cuts have had a negative impact on the works in the property.

The State Party confirms its intention to call on the international community to provide further financial and technical support for the conservation of cultural heritage, including through the Heritage Emergency Fund of UNESCO. The State Party considered the March 2020 technical meeting with ICOMOS and the World Heritage Centre successful as it enabled direct discussion and consultation. It has indicated its willingness to start the drafting of the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR).

The State Party considers that the property is not facing any specific ascertained danger and is considered to be stable in both security and administrative terms. Therefore, it requests the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger and has extended an invitation for a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to assess the property’s state of conservation.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2021

A comprehensive strategy for managing and conserving the property is necessary to address not only the impact of armed conflict, but also vegetation growth and environmental factors. The ongoing steps for the elaboration of a Management Plan are crucial, and it is therefore recommended that the Committee call on the international community to ensure technical and financial support.

The State Party has made important efforts to secure funding from different donors despite the difficulties and the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, such as the International Alliance for the protection of heritage in conflict areas (ALIPH) and the UNDP, for the conservation of Libyan World Heritage properties. It is recommended that the Committee welcome these efforts and projects undertaken for capacity building, maintenance, vegetation control and protection. However, the reported use of white cement in the conservation intervention at the Roman Theatre is an inappropriate material for restoration of ancient buildings, and it is recommended that the Committee request that technical specifications and materials for conservation/restoration works at the Roman Theatre and archaeological vestiges are discussed in detail with ICOMOS before being applied.

The World Heritage Centre organized a meeting in Paris in March 2020 to address the elaboration of a DSOCR and related corrective measures, boundary modifications and the Tentative List. Participants comprised the State Party, ICOMOS, the UNESCO Rabat Office, and the World Heritage Centre. Discussions also focused on restoration works at the Roman Theatre, and technical advice was provided on the continuation of activities and damage assessment.

Given the current prevailing situation and funding needs, the DoA has decided to focus on urgent preventive actions at the Roman Theatre with the aim of securing the building and limiting damage, as well as ensuring the safety of visitors.

The improvement of the security situation may provide the State Party with more means to undertake the necessary actions for the conservation and protection of the property. It is recommended that the State Party continue its important efforts in line with the Action Plan that was developed during the International Meeting on the Safeguarding of Libyan Cultural Heritage, held in Tunis in May 2016 (report available at: http://whc.unesco.org/en/news/1496). It is recommended that the Committee request the State Party to provide information on progress made in the implementation of this Action Plan.

The submitted draft minor boundary modification proposal is recognized as an indispensable step towards the effective protection and management of the property. The ongoing close consultation with the World Heritage Centre and ICOMOS concerning the definition of an appropriate buffer zone is appreciated. It is recommended that the Committee encourage the State Party to continue this cooperation, and to submit the proposal in line with Paragraph 164 of the Operational Guidelines.

It is essential that the joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS mission invited by the State Party and requested by the Committee at its previous sessions is undertaken as soon as security conditions permit, in order to evaluate the state of conservation of the property. In the meantime, it is important that the State Party develops the DSOCR and a set of corrective measures, in collaboration with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies.

It is recommended that the State Party keeps the Committee updated on the situation at the property and on its activities, including the restoration of the Roman Theatre and any plans for major restoration or new construction projects that may affect the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property. 

It is therefore recommended that the Committee retain the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2021
44 COM 7A.13
Archaeological Site of Sabratha (Libya) (C 184)
Decision: 44 COM 7A.13

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7A,
  2. Recalling Decision 43 COM 7A.25, adopted at its 43rd session (Baku, 2019),
  3. Notes with appreciation the efforts undertaken by the State Party to address conservation threats at the property and in fundraising activities that have led to projects aimed at the preservation of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property;
  4. Requests the State Party to continue its efforts in this regard to the extent possible and to discuss with ICOMOS the restoration techniques and materials planned to be used at the Roman Theatre and the other archaeological vestiges before their application;
  5. Also requests the State Party to keep the Committee informed on the evolution of the situation at the property and to inform it, through the World Heritage Centre, on any on-going and future plans for major restoration or new construction projects that may affect the OUV of the property, in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  6. Further requests the State Party to report on any progress achieved in the implementation of the Action Plan developed during the International Meeting on the Safeguarding of Libyan Cultural Heritage (Tunis, May 2016);
  7. Requests furthermore the State Party to initiate the process to develop a set of corrective measures and a timeframe for their implementation, as well as the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR), in collaboration with the World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies;
  8. Encourages the State Party to pursue the development of a Management Plan for the property, and invites it to seek the necessary technical and financial support and allocate the necessary resources for its implementation;
  9. Continues to call for an increased mobilization by the international community to provide financial and technical support to the State Party, including through the UNESCO Heritage Emergency Fund, to implement the short- and medium-term measures identified during the 2016 Tunis Meeting;
  10. Also welcomes the elaboration of a Minor Boundary Modification proposal, and requests moreover the State Party to continue the close consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, and to submit it in line with Paragraph 164 of the Operational Guidelines
  11. Acknowledges the invitation by the State Party for a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the property to evaluate its State of Conservation, to take place as soon as the security conditions permit;
  12. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session;
  13. Decides to retain the Archaeological Site of Sabratha (Libya) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
44 COM 8C.2
Update of the List of World Heritage in Danger (Retained Properties)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined the state of conservation reports of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger (WHC/21/44.COM/7A, WHC/21/44.COM/7A.Add, WHC/21/44.COM/7A.Add.2, WHC/21/44.COM/7A.Add.2.Add),
  2. Decides to retain the following properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger:
  • Afghanistan, Cultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley (Decision 44 COM 7A.28)
  • Afghanistan, Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam (Decision 44 COM 7A.29)
  • Austria, Historic Centre of Vienna (Decision 44 COM 7A.32)
  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of), City of Potosí (Decision 44 COM 7A.35)
  • Central African Republic, Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.39)
  • Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea, Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (Decision 44 COM 7A.40)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Garamba National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.41)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kahuzi-Biega National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.42)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Okapi Wildlife Reserve (Decision 44 COM 7A.43)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Virunga National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.45)
  • Egypt, Abu Mena (Decision 44 COM 7A.5)
  • Honduras, Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (Decision 44 COM 7A.55)
  • Indonesia, Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra (Decision 44 COM 7A.52)
  • Iraq, Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat) (Decision 44 COM 7A.6)
  • Iraq, Hatra (Decision 44 COM 7A.7)
  • Iraq, Samarra Archaeological City (Decision 44 COM 7A.8)
  • Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (site proposed by Jordan) (Decision 44 COM 7A.10)
  • Kenya, Lake Turkana National Parks (Decision 44 COM 7A.47)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Cyrene (Decision 44 COM 7A.11)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna (Decision 44 COM 7A.12)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Sabratha (Decision 44 COM 7A.13)
  • Libya, Old Town of Ghadamès (Decision 44 COM 7A.14)
  • Libya, Rock-Art Sites of Tadrart Acacus (Decision 44 COM 7A.15)
  • Madagascar, Rainforests of the Atsinanana (Decision 44 COM 7A.48)
  • Mali, Old Towns of Djenné (Decision 44 COM 7A.1)
  • Mali, Timbuktu (Decision 44 COM 7A.2)
  • Mali, Tomb of Askia (Decision 44 COM 7A.3)
  • Mexico, Islands and Protected Areas of the Gulf of California (Decision 44 COM 7B.56)
  • Micronesia (Federated States of), Nan Madol: Ceremonial Centre of Eastern Micronesia (Decision 44 COM 7A.30)
  • Niger, Aïr and Ténéré Natural Reserves (Decision 44 COM 7A.49)
  • Palestine, Palestine: Land of Olives and Vines – Cultural Landscape of Southern Jerusalem, Battir (Decision 44 COM 7A.17)
  • Palestine, Hebron/Al-Khalil Old Town (Decision 44 COM 7A.16)
  • Panama, Fortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo (Decision 44 COM 7A.36)
  • Peru, Chan Chan Archaelogical Zone (Decision 44 COM 7A.37)
  • Senegal, Niokolo-Koba National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.50)
  • Serbia, Medieval Monuments in Kosovo (Decision 44 COM 7A.33)
  • Solomon Islands, East Rennell (Decision 44 COM 7A.53)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Aleppo (Decision 44 COM 7A.18)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Bosra (Decision 44 COM 7A.19)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Damascus (Decision 44 COM 7A.20)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient Villages of Northern Syria (Decision 44 COM 7A.21)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Crac des Chevaliers and Qal’at Salah El-Din (Decision 44 COM 7A.22)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Site of Palmyra (Decision 44 COM 7A.23)
  • Uganda, Tombs of Buganda Kings at Kasubi (Decision 44 COM 7A.4)
  • United Republic of Tanzania, Selous Game Reserve (Decision 44 COM 7A.51)
  • United States of America, Everglades National Park (Decision 44 COM 7A.54)
  • Uzbekistan, Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz (Decision 44 COM 7A.31)
  • Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Coro and its Port (Decision 44 COM 7A.38)
  • Yemen, Historic Town of Zabid (Decision 44 COM 7A.25)
  • Yemen, Old City of Sana’a (Decision 44 COM 7A.26)
  • Yemen, Old Walled City of Shibam (Decision 44 COM 7A.27).
Draft Decision: 44 COM 7A.13

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/21/44.COM/7A,
  2. Recalling Decision 43 COM 7A.25, adopted at its 43rd session (Baku, 2019),
  3. Notes with appreciation the efforts undertaken by the State Party to address conservation threats at the property and in fundraising activities that have led to projects aimed at the preservation of the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property;
  4. Requests the State Party to continue its efforts in this regard to the extent possible and to discuss with ICOMOS the restoration techniques and materials planned to be used at the Roman Theatre and the other archaeological vestiges before their application;
  5. Also requests the State Party to keep the Committee informed on the evolution of the situation at the property and to inform it, through the World Heritage Centre, on any on-going and future plans for major restoration or new construction projects that may affect the OUV of the property, in conformity with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  6. Further requests the State Party to report on any progress achieved in the implementation of the Action Plan developed during the International Meeting on the Safeguarding of Libyan Cultural Heritage (Tunis, May 2016);
  7. Requests furthermore the State Party to initiate the process to develop a set of corrective measures and a timeframe for their implementation, as well as the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR), in collaboration with the World Heritage Centre and Advisory Bodies;
  8. Encourages the State Party to pursue the development of a Management Plan for the property, and invites it to seek the necessary technical and financial support and allocate the necessary resources for its implementation;
  9. Continues to call for an increased mobilization by the international community to provide financial and technical support to the State Party, including through the UNESCO Heritage Emergency Fund, to implement the short- and medium-term measures identified during the 2016 Tunis Meeting;
  10. Also welcomes the elaboration of a Minor Boundary Modification proposal, and requests moreover the State Party to continue the close consultation with the World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies, and to submit it in line with Paragraph 164 of the Operational Guidelines
  11. Acknowledges the invitation by the State Party for a joint World Heritage Centre/ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission to the property to evaluate its State of Conservation, to take place as soon as the security conditions permit;
  12. Finally requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2022, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 45th session in 2022;
  13. Decides to retain the Archaeological Site of Sabratha (Libya) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2021
Libya
Date of Inscription: 1982
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (iii)
Danger List (dates): 2016-present
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2020) .pdf
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
arrow_circle_right 44COM (2021)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top