Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works

Chile
Factors affecting the property in 2018*
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Wind
  • Other Threats:

    Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years; Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings such as the Leaching House are liable to structural collapse if no support is given

Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Factors affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Management systems/management plan
  • Wind
  • Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction
  • Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years as well as vandalism at the property
  • Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements
  • A few buildings such as the Leaching House are liable to structural collapse if no support is given
  • Damage caused by earthquakes and the wind (damages due to the 2014 earthquake addressed)
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
  • Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings
  • Lack of maintenance for 40 years
  • Vandalism due to looting of re-usable materials
  • Damage caused by the wind
Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger
Corrective Measures for the property
Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2018
Requests approved: 3 (from 2007-2015)
Total amount approved : 135,000 USD
Missions to the property until 2018**

October 2004: ICOMOS evaluation mission; May 2007: World Heritage Centre site visit; April 2010: Joint World Heritage Centre / ICOMOS Reactive Monitoring mission

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2018

On 2 February 2018, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, the executive summary of which is available at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1178/documents/. The State Party expects that the implementation of the corrective measures, as defined in 37 COM 7A.37, will be completed by the end of 2018, and reports the following:

  • 56% of the activities of the Priority Intervention Programme (PIP) 2005-2008 have been implemented and the remaining 44% (for which financing and a technical team have been secured) will be concluded by the end of 2018;
  • The completion and implementation of the property’s Conservation Plan is expected in the second half of 2018;
  • The current project between the State Parties of Chile and Mexico aims to strengthen technical capacities to develop conservation and monitoring plans for World Heritage properties;
  • Safety measures for the site, including the vehicle traffic restriction in Route A-16, and for its workers and visitors are implemented effectively;
  • The Management Plan, approved in 2013, is in place and its seven programmes are in effect. During 2018, work will begin on updating the Management Plan up to 2023;
  • Financial resources have been provided on a sustainable basis and 30 staff members now work on site. Additional resources will be made available under a national World Heritage Programme;
  • The 2013 Strategic Interpretation Plan remains in full force; the rehabilitation of two buildings (one for an Interpretation Centre and another one for a Documentation Centre) was concluded;
  • Buffer zones have been identified and their legal protection as Typical Zones was approved in January 2018 by the National Monuments Council. It is expected that the formal decree will be issued shortly, following which the proposal for a Minor Boundary Modification will be submitted to the World Heritage Centre. Regulations of use for the zones will be developed throughout the course of 2018;
  • Five out of six emergency interventions were executed in 2017 under the UNESCO Emergency International Assistance;
  • Extensive studies on materials and their conservation were undertaken and a Monitoring and Maintenance Manual elaborated;
  • A Risk Management Plan is being prepared under the project “Strengthening Disaster Risk Management at 3 World Heritage Properties in Chile” funded by the German cooperation with the assistance of the World Heritage Centre. It is expected to be concluded in 2018.

The Ministry of Cultures, Arts and Heritage was officially created, integrating the National Board for Archives and Museums and the National Centre for World Heritage Sites. The new National Policy for Culture 2017-2022 intends to align national heritage regulations with relevant international conventions.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2018

The State Party should be commended for the important advances it has made in the implementation of the corrective measures established in Decision 37 COM 7A.37.  The official creation of the Ministry of Cultures, Arts and Heritage should be welcomed.

The following observations are made regarding the corrective measures that are to be completed by the end of 2018:

  1. Full implementation of the Priority Interventions Programme (PIP), according to its 2005 and 2008 definitions: By the end of 2017, 56% of this programme’s actions had been implemented. It may be optimistic to expect that the remaining 44% will be implemented within a one-year period;
  2. Full design and initial implementation of the comprehensive Conservation Plan, based on the necessary scientific research, a clear conservation strategy, and the appropriate safety and security standards: Important preparatory work has been carried out for the elaboration of the Conservation Plan. This Plan should be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies as soon as it becomes available;

iii.      Security and protection measures for the site fully operational: The State Party has reported on this area for several years and the security and protection measures are fully operational;

  1. Sustained implementation of the management plan and fully operational management system in place: The Management Plan was approved in 2013 and has been in full implementation since then. The management system has proven to be fully operational, and the Plan will be updated for a new period until 2023;
  2. Management plan articulated with local and regional planning instruments: The updated Management Plan will explicitly incorporate guidelines derived from regional and local regulations;
  3. Appropriate and sustained human, financial and material resources for the conservation and management of the property secured and vii. Stable and continuous contribution by the State for the conservation and management of the property, in a framework of shared funding (public / private): The Saltpeter Museum Corporation has 30 staff members in total, including heritage related specialists, administration, maintenance and security staff. Financial contributions from entrance fees, mining companies, the state, and other sources appear to have reached a sustainable level;

viii.    Visitor strategy and interpretation plan fully in place: The Strategic Interpretation Plan has been in force since 2013 and a full programme has been implemented. Rehabilitation works for an Interpretation Centre and a Documentation Centre have been concluded. Visitor numbers have been gradually increasing from 49 000 in 2005 to 91 000 in 2016;

ix.      Site’s facilities and activities contribute to the conservation and protection of the Outstanding Universal Value of the property: Conservation, interpretation, communication and outreach programmes have been implemented systematically;

x.      Buffer zone fully established and approved and regulatory measures for its protection adopted and enforced: The declaration of the proposed buffer zones as a National Monument under the category of Typical Zone is an important step towards the fulfilment of this measure. Regulatory measures remain to be established, as does the formal submission of the buffer zone as a Minor Boundary Modification to the World Heritage Centre.

It may indeed be expected, as the State Party indicates, that the corrective measures can be implemented by the end of 2018. However, some important measures, such as the Conservation Plan and the buffer zone regulations, are still to be completed. These plans should be submitted and reviewed by the Advisory Bodies to assess the progress made in the achievement of the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR).

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2018
42 COM 7A.9
Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works (Chile) (C 1178 bis)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/18/42.COM/7A,
  2. Recalling Decision 41 COM 7A.24, adopted at its 41st session (Krakow, 2017),
  3. Commends the State Party for its sustained effort and commitment to implement the programme of corrective measures within the established timeframe and welcomes the recent creation of the Ministry of Cultures, Arts and Heritage;
  4. Encourages the State Party to complete the programme of corrective measures by the end of 2018 in order to assess the achievement of the Desired state of conservation, in view of the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger;
  5. Also welcomes the solution found for the protection of the proposed buffer zone and the declaration of this zone as a National Monument under the category of Typical Zone, requests the State Party to establish the regulatory measures for its management and protection, and further requests it to submit the buffer zone as a a formal Minor Boundary Modification application, as per Paragraph 163 and 164 of the Operational Guidelines, to the World Centre for evaluation by the Advisory Bodies and consideration by the World Heritage Committee;
  6. Urges the State Party to complete the Conservation Plan and to submit it as soon as it becomes available to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  7. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2019, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 43rd session in 2019;
  8. Decides to retain Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works (Chile) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
42 COM 8C.2
Update of the List of World Heritage in Danger (Retained Properties)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined the state of conservation reports of properties inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger (WHC/18/42.COM/7A, WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add and WHC/18/42.COM/7A.Add.2),
  2. Decides to retain the following properties on the List of World Heritage in Danger:
  • Afghanistan, Cultural Landscape and Archaeological Remains of the Bamiyan Valley (Decision 42 COM 7A.1)
  • Afghanistan, Minaret and Archaeological Remains of Jam (Decision 42 COM 7A.2)
  • Austria, Historic Centre of Vienna (Decision 42 COM 7A.5)
  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of), City of Potosí (Decision 42 COM 7A.8)
  • Central African Republic, Manovo-Gounda St Floris National Park (Decision 42 COM 7A.45)
  • Chile, Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works (Decision 42 COM 7A.9)
  • Côte d'Ivoire / Guinea, Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (Decision 42 COM 7A.46)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Garamba National Park (Decision 42 COM 7A.47)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kahuzi-Biega National Park (Decision 42 COM 7A.48)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Okapi Wildlife Reserve (Decision 42 COM 7A.49)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Salonga National Park (Decision 42 COM 7A.50)
  • Democratic Republic of the Congo, Virunga National Park (Decision 42 COM 7A.51)
  • Egypt, Abu Mena (Decision 42 COM 7A.17)
  • Honduras, Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve (Decision 42 COM 7A.44)
  • Indonesia, Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra (Decision 42 COM 7A.40)
  • Iraq, Ashur (Qal'at Sherqat) (Decision 42 COM 7A.18)
  • Iraq, Hatra (Decision 42 COM 7A.19)
  • Iraq, Samarra Archaeological City (Decision 42 COM 7A.20)
  • Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls (site proposed by Jordan) (Decision 42 COM 7A.21)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Cyrene (Decision 42 COM 7A.22)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Leptis Magna (Decision 42 COM 7A.23)
  • Libya, Archaeological Site of Sabratha (Decision 42 COM 7A.24)
  • Libya, Old Town of Ghadamès (Decision 42 COM 7A.25)
  • Libya, Rock-Art Sites of Tadrart Acacus (Decision 42 COM 7A.26)
  • Madagascar, Rainforests of the Atsinanana (Decision 42 COM 7A.53)
  • Mali, Old Towns of Djenné (Decision 42 COM 7A.13)
  • Mali, Timbuktu (Decision 42 COM 7A.14)
  • Mali, Tomb of Askia (Decision 42 COM 7A.15)
  • Micronesia (Federated States of), Nan Madol: Ceremonial Centre of Eastern Micronesia (Decision 42 COM 7A.3)
  • Niger, Aïr and Ténéré Natural Reserves (Decision 42 COM 7A.54)
  • Palestine, Birthplace of Jesus: Church of the Nativity and the Pilgrimage Route, Bethlehem (Decision 42 COM 7A.27)
  • Palestine, Palestine: Land of Olives and Vines – Cultural Landscape of Southern Jerusalem, Battir (Decision 42 COM 7A.29)
  • Palestine, Hebron/Al-Khalil Old Town (Decision 42 COM 7A.28)
  • Panama, Fortifications on the Caribbean Side of Panama: Portobelo-San Lorenzo (Decision 42 COM 7A.10)
  • Peru, Chan Chan Archaelogical Zone (Decision 42 COM 7A.11)
  • Senegal, Niokolo-Koba National Park (Decision 42 COM 7A.55)
  • Serbia, Medieval Monuments in Kosovo (Decision 42 COM 7A.6)
  • Solomon Islands, East Rennell (Decision 42 COM 7A.41)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Aleppo (Decision 42 COM 7A.30)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Bosra (Decision 42 COM 7A.31)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient City of Damascus (Decision 42 COM 7A.32)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Ancient Villages of Northern Syria (Decision 42 COM 7A.33)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Crac des Chevaliers and Qal’at Salah El-Din (Decision 42 COM 7A.34)
  • Syrian Arab Republic, Site of Palmyra (Decision 42 COM 7A.35)
  • Uganda, Tombs of Buganda Kings at Kasubi (Decision 42 COM 7A.16)
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Liverpool – Maritime Mercantile City (Decision 42 COM 7A.7)
  • United Republic of Tanzania, Selous Game Reserve (Decision 42 COM 7A.56)
  • United States of America, Everglades National Park (Decision 42 COM 7A.42)
  • Uzbekistan, Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz (Decision 42 COM 7A.4)
  • Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Coro and its Port (Decision 42 COM 7A.12)
  • Yemen, Historic Town of Zabid (Decision 42 COM 7A.37)
  • Yemen, Old City of Sana’a (Decision 42 COM 7A.38)
  • Yemen, Old Walled City of Shibam (Decision 42 COM 7A.39)
Draft Decision: 42 COM 7A.9

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/18/42.COM/7A,
  2. Recalling Decision 41 COM 7A.24, adopted at its 41st session (Krakow, 2017),
  3. Commends the State Party for its sustained effort and commitment to implement the programme of corrective measures within the established timeframe and welcomes the recent creation of the Ministry of Cultures, Arts and Heritage;
  4. Encourages the State Party to complete the programme of corrective measures by the end of 2018 in order to assess the achievement of the Desired state of conservation, in view of the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger;
  5. Also welcomes the solution found for the protection of the proposed buffer zone and the declaration of this zone as a National Monument under the category of Typical Zone, requests the State Party to establish the regulatory measures for its management and protection, and further requests it to submit the buffer zone as a a formal Minor Boundary Modification application, as per Paragraph 163 and 164 of the Operational Guidelines, to the World Centre for evaluation by the Advisory Bodies and consideration by the World Heritage Committee;
  6. Urges the State Party to complete the Conservation Plan and to submit it as soon as it becomes available to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies;
  7. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2019, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 43rd session in 2019;
  8. Decides to retain Humberstone and Santa Laura Saltpeter Works (Chile) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2018
Chile
Date of Inscription: 2005
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(iii)(iv)
Danger List (dates): 2005-2019
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2018) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 42COM (2018)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top