Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

South China Karst

China
Factors affecting the property in 2017*
  • Governance
  • Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

Threats identified at the time of extension of the property in 2014:

  • Management systems/management plan (property-wide management plan not yet finalized, actions to manage tourism, water quality, agricultural and urban development impacts not implemented)
  • Governance (Integrated governance arrangements not implemented)
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2017
Requests approved: 1 (from 2004-2004)
Total amount approved : 20,100 USD
Missions to the property until 2017**
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2017

On 6 December 2016, the State Party submitted a report on the state of conservation of the property, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1248/documents and responds to Committee Decision 38 COM 8B.9, as follows:

  • A Conservation and Management Plan of South China Karst (CMP-SCK) for the entire serial property was completed and submitted to the World Heritage Centre on 29 February 2016. Since 2015, the responsibility for the overall coordination and administration of the property rests with the Protection and Administration Coordinating Committee for South China Karst World Heritage Sites (PACC);
  • Construction within the property is forbidden, and the permissible scale of buildings in the buffer zone defined. There is also a limit on the number of tourism facilities;
  • Illegal tourism activities in Guilin Karst have been much reduced by dismantling 762 stalls and 41 illegal buildings and by detaining rafts and canoes involved in illegal boating;
  • Visitor capacity is monitored in real time and an early warning system is in place to prevent capacity overload. Regulations for tour operators are also in place;
  • There are plans for two tourist roads which would cross Shilin Karst but the State Party notes that these will have a negative influence on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property;
  • Wukeshu Village has been relocated outside the property. The people affected are reported to have received support from local government, including to set up new industries;
  • Water quality within and upstream from the property is reported to be generally good, although there are some problems locally. Various measures are being taken to further improve water quality;
  • Various measures are being taken to address impacts from agriculture, including the promotion of tourism as an alternative source of income;
  • Measures are also being taken to coordinate and manage urban development, based on the principle that protection of heritage is preferred to its utilization.

The State Party notes that a high-speed railway project linking Guiyang to Nanning (GN Railway) is planned, which will cross the buffer zone of Libo Karst.

The State Party refers to a revision of the boundaries of Wulong Karst. However, no request for a boundary modification was submitted in the appropriate format, as laid out in Paragraph 164 of the Operational Guidelines. On 23 January 2017, the World Heritage Centre requested the State Party to submit the proposal in the required format for review by IUCN.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2017

The progress achieved by the State Party in implementing an integrated management system for the serial property as a whole should be welcomed. The CMP-SCK covers the period 2016-2025, and complements the individual management plans of each component of the property by providing an overarching management plan that has the property’s OUV at its core. It identifies threats at each component, including threats to biological values, which are not part of the OUV. It includes specific targets and management measures for water, solid waste, air pollution, light pollution, and noise control, as well as separate chapters on tourism, local communities, education, scientific research, and monitoring. The adoption of the CMP-SCK and the establishment of the PACC are significant steps to ensure an integrated approach to planning, governance and management of the serial property.

Impacts from tourism, agriculture, water pollution and urban development continue to be closely monitored by the State Party, and measures have been taken at individual sites to address these. The implementation of the CMP-SCK should enable further progress to be made in this regard. The effectiveness of these measures should be closely monitored by the State Party, to ensure that they are achieving the desired results. Particular care should be taken to ensure that the promotion of tourism as an alternative livelihood to agriculture does not exacerbate the current impacts and threats from tourism development and high levels of visitation.

The two planned tourist roads that would cross the property at Shilin Karst are a significant concern. While no further information on these projects has been provided, the State Party has noted that they are likely to have a negative impact on OUV. It is therefore recommended that the Committee urge the State Party not to proceed with these projects.

The planned Guiyang-Nanning high-speed railway (GN Railway) that would cross the buffer zone of Libo Karst (in between the two separate components of Libo Karst) is potentially of concern. Annex 2 of the State Party’s report discusses the alternative alignments that were considered and clarifies why these were abandoned, and goes on to state that the project is unlikely to have any impact on the OUV of the property. However, a full Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the project has not been submitted. It is therefore also recommended that the Committee request the State Party to submit an EIA, with a specific section focusing on the potential impact of the project on the OUV, for the GN Railway project to the World Heritage Centre, for review by IUCN, before making any decisions that would be difficult to reverse, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines.

The relocation of Wukeshu Village outside the property is noted, as is the support reported to have been provided to the affected people. It is recommended that the Committee also request the State Party to provide detailed information on the processes that were followed, in particular to ensure that the relocation has been carried out with the consent of the population concerned.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2017
41 COM 7B.26
South China Karst (China) (N 1248bis)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/17/41.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 38 COM 8B.9, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014),
  3. Welcomes progress achieved by the State Party to integrate planning, governance and management across the whole serial property, including the finalization of the Conservation and Management Plan of South China Karst (CMP-SCK) and the establishment of the Protection and Administration Coordinating Committee for South China Karst World Heritage Sites (PACC);
  4. Notes with appreciation the efforts made by the State Party to address impacts from tourism, water pollution, agriculture and urban development, considers that the implementation of the CMP-SCK should enable the State Party to make further progress in this regard, and urges the State Party to closely monitor the effectiveness of the measures taken, in particular to ensure that the promotion of tourism as an alternative livelihood to agriculture does not exacerbate the current impacts and threats from tourism development and high levels of visitation in the property;
  5. Notes with concern the two planned tourist roads that would cross the property at Shilin Karst, which according to the State Party would have a negative influence on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, and also urges the State Party to not proceed with these projects;
  6. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, for review by IUCN, the results of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the planned Guiyang-Nanning High-speed Railway (GN Railway) that would cross the buffer zone of Libo Karst, including a specific section focusing on the potential impact of the project on the OUV, before making any decisions that would be difficult to reverse, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  7. Takes note of the relocation of Wukeshu Village, and also requests the State Party to provide detailed information about the processes followed, in particular to ensure that the relocation was carried out with the consent of the population concerned;
  8. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2018, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 43rd session in 2019.
Draft Decision: 41 COM 7B.26

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/17/41.COM/7B,
  2. Recalling Decision 38 COM 8B.9, adopted at its 38th session (Doha, 2014),
  3. Welcomes progress achieved by the State Party to integrate planning, governance and management across the whole serial property, including the finalization of the Conservation and Management Plan of South China Karst (CMP-SCK) and the establishment of the Protection and Administration Coordinating Committee for South China Karst World Heritage Sites (PACC);
  4. Notes with appreciation the efforts made by the State Party to address impacts from tourism, water pollution, agriculture and urban development, considers that the implementation of the CMP-SCK should enable the State Party to make further progress in this regard, and urges the State Party to closely monitor the effectiveness of the measures taken, in particular to ensure that the promotion of tourism as an alternative livelihood to agriculture does not exacerbate the current impacts and threats from tourism development and high levels of visitation in the property;
  5. Notes with concern the two planned tourist roads that would cross the property at Shilin Karst, which according to the State Party would have a negative influence on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, and also urges the State Party to not proceed with these projects;
  6. Requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, for review by IUCN, the results of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the planned Guiyang-Nanning High-speed Railway (GN Railway) that would cross the buffer zone of Libo Karst, including a specific section focusing on the potential impact of the project on the OUV, before making any decisions that would be difficult to reverse, in accordance with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines;
  7. Takes note of the relocation of Wukeshu Village, and also requests the State Party to provide detailed information about the processes followed, in particular to ensure that the relocation was carried out with the consent of the population concerned;
  8. Further requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 December 2018, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 43rd session in 2019.
Report year: 2017
China
Date of Inscription: 2007
Category: Natural
Criteria: (vii)(viii)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2016) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 41COM (2017)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top