Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Bolgar Historical and Archaeological Complex

Russian Federation
Factors affecting the property in 2016*
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
Threats identified at the time of inscription of the property:
  • Incomplete Management Plan
  • Pilgrimage village within the site boundaries
  • Some conservation works prevent distinguishing between historic and added materials
  • Proposed development of new projects or visitor infrastructure on the site
International Assistance: requests for the property until 2016
Requests approved: 0
Total amount approved : 0 USD
Missions to the property until 2016**
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2016

On 30 November 2015, the State Party submitted a state of conservation report, which is available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/981/documents/, and addresses the progress made in the implementation of the Decision adopted by the World Heritage Committee at its 38th session (Doha, 2014).

The report provides information on measures implemented in response to the decisions of the Committee as follows:

  • The development of the management plan has been carried out on the basis of the concept as presented in the nomination dossier. On 15 February 2016, the State Party submitted the management plan to the World Heritage Centre for review by the Advisory Bodies. It includes strategic objectives for the integrated plan of preservation and management of the Bolgar Historical and Archaeological Complex and highlights some gaps in legal and regulatory protection for parts of the property (the Island) and for the buffer zone;
  • A system of monitoring has been developed on the assumption of the main objective of preservation of the Outstanding Universal Value of the Bolgar Historical and Archaeological Complex. This system includes precise indications to observe and document the state of conservation of the property;
  • The relocation of the tent village set up for pilgrims was completed in 2014. As from summer 2015, the camp has been functioning on its new location;
  • In 2015, the work has begun to establish a comprehensive site archive and store in order to collect all data, reports and archaeological finds, in a centralized facility in the vicinity of the property;
  • The treatment of surfaces of historical materials has been reduced and minimized in order to make a clear distinction between historic and added materials. Newly revealed archaeological objects undergo consolidation after their excavation in order to provide constructive stability of the elements of the ruins.

On 11 November 2015, the State Party informed the World Heritage Centre of the intention to develop the Bolgar Islamic Academy as a spiritual and educational centre to serve the increasing number of pilgrims to the property following its inscription on World Heritage List. The letter also announces the possibility to build additional training facilities and a dormitory 300-400m away from the White Mosque. 

Taking into account ICOMOS recommendations regarding this project, on 14 March 2016, the State Party submitted to the World Heritage Centre the Heritage Impact Assessment of the project for review by ICOMOS.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2016

The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies are of the view that the Committee’s recommendations are being addressed continuously by the State Party and no further reporting is required in the short term. The State Party is encouraged to continue with the implementation of the measures requested by the Committee and with those envisaged in the Management Plan, notably the establishment and enforcement of legal and regulatory protection measures for the part of the property not yet protected and for the buffer zone, in order to ensure an appropriate state of conservation and to prevent threats from affecting its Outstanding Universal Value, in particular from activities outside the boundaries of the World Heritage property.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2016
40 COM 7B.105
Omnibus Decision

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/16/40.COM/7B,
  2. Takes note with satisfaction of the measures taken by the States Parties concerned to address its previous requests to mitigate the threats on the Outstanding Universal Value of the following World Heritage properties:
    • Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower (Azerbaijan),
    • Bolgar Historical and Archaeological Complex (Russian Federation),
    • New Lanark (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland),
    • Monumental Earthworks of Poverty Point (United States of America);
  3. Encourages the States Parties concerned to pursue their efforts to ensure the conservation of World Heritage properties;
  4. Recalling the benefits to States Parties of systematically utilizing Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs) and Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) in the review of development projects, also encourages States Parties to integrate the EIA/HIA processes into legislation, planning mechanisms and management plans, and reiterates its recommendation to States Parties to use these tools in assessing projects, including assessment of cumulative impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of properties, as early as possible and before any final decision is taken;
  5. Reminds the States Parties concerned to inform the World Heritage Centre in due course about any major development project that may negatively impact the Outstanding Universal Value of a property, before any irreversible decisions are made, in line with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines.
Draft Decision: 40 COM 7B.105

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/16/40.COM/7B,
  2. Takes note with satisfaction of the measures taken by the States Parties concerned to address its previous requests to mitigate the threats on the Outstanding Universal Value of the following World Heritage properties:
    1. Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower (Azerbaijan),
    2. Bolgar Historical and Archaeological Complex (Russian Federation),
    3. New Lanark (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland),
    4. Monumental Earthworks of Poverty Point (United States of America);
  3. Encourages the States Parties concerned to pursue their efforts to ensure the conservation of World Heritage properties;
  4. Recalling the benefits to States Parties of systematically utilizing Heritage Impact Assessments (HIAs) and Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) in the review of development projects, encourages States Parties to integrate the EIA/HIA processes into legislation, planning mechanisms and management plans, and reiterates its recommendation to States Parties to use these tools in assessing projects, including assessment of cumulative impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value of properties, as early as possible and before any final decision is taken;
  5. Reminds the States Parties concerned to inform the World Heritage Centre in due course about any major development project that may negatively impact the Outstanding Universal Value of a property, before any irreversible decisions are made, in line with Paragraph 172 of the Operational Guidelines.
Report year: 2016
Russian Federation
Date of Inscription: 2014
Category: Cultural
Criteria: (ii)(vi)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2015) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 40COM (2016)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top