jump to the content

State of Conservation (SOC)

Taï National Park (1988)

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds
International Assistance granted to the property

Requests Approved: 0 (from1983-1987)
Total Amount Ap proved: 42,000USD

1987   2-year training for one specialist from Tai National Park at ...   12,000  USD
1983   Contribution to the construction of a wardens' station, purchase ...   30,000  USD
Missions**
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

Poaching, gold prospection, tree-felling, and subsequent encroachment

Corrective Measures
Current conservation issues

IUCN has brought this site to the attention of the Committee four times since 1982, recommending it for consideration in the List of World Heritage in Danger.

The values of the park have been considerably eroded since it was inscribed through gold mining, poaches, illegal settlement and felling of timber inside the park.

 

 

Conclusion

The Committee should make further attempts for information from the Tai authorities recognising that prospects for some improvements are now possible through a WWF-funded project in the park.

Decision
  • Adopted

  • Draft Decision

12COMX.A
Link to the decision

3) Tai National Park (Cote d'Ivoire)

The Committee noted that the natural values of this property had declined due to various illegal activities within the park. The Committee was, however, glad to learn of a forthcoming project financed by WWF, US-AID and possibly with a contribution from the World Heritage which could help mitigate the current situation, and requested IUCN to report back to the Committee at its next session.

 

No draft Decision

Taï National Park
State Party:
Côte d'Ivoire
Date of Inscription: 1982
Nomination records (Year): 1981
Category: Natural
Criteria: (vii)(x)
Exports
Word File
SOC Reports (year)
2012
2009
2007
2004
1989
1988
1986
1985
1984
Threats*
  • Crop production
  • Mining
  • Illegal activities
  • Other Threats:


* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.