Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

587
Reports
118
Properties concerned
70
States Parties with SOC reports
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2014
Document Source: WHC-14/38.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity.
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity.
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Impact of the new structure of the Maya Devi Temple (constructed in 2002) on the archaeological remains, as well as on the visual integrity.
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Impact of new structure of the Maya Devi Temple in the core area
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Extremely harsh natural environment; Improve the drainage for the Temple
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Extremely harsh natural environment; Improve the drainage for the Temple
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Extremely harsh natural environment; Improve the drainage for the Temple
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Extremely harsh natural environment
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Extremely harsh natural environment
States Parties: Lesotho South Africa
Year: 2023
Document Source: WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Buffer zones not yet formalized
States Parties: Lesotho South Africa
Year: 2021
Document Source: WHC/21/44.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Buffer zones not yet formalized
States Parties: Lesotho South Africa
Year: 2019
Document Source: WHC/19/43.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Lesotho South Africa
Year: 2017
Document Source: WHC/17/41.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Lesotho South Africa
Year: 2015
Document Source: WHC-15/39.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for further research and documentation to establish an inventory of rock art in Sehlabathebe National Park; Need for study of the potential cultural contribution of other landscape elements to the cultural values of Sehlabathebe National Park
States Parties: South Africa
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: South Africa
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Attention to be paid to the conservation of stone and stuccos
States Parties: Honduras
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Attention to be paid to the conservation of stone and stuccos

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top