Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

The List Göreme National Park and the Rock Sites of ...

Göreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia

Advisory Bodies Evaluations
1985 Advisory Body Evaluation (ICOMOS) / Évaluation de l'organisation consultative (ICOMOS)
1985 Advisory Body Evaluation (IUCN)
Maps
2012 Goreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia. Map showing Goreme National Park
2012 Goreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia. Map showing Karain site
2012 Goreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia. Map showing Karlik site
2012 Goreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia. Map showing Yesiloz site
2012 Goreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia. Map showing Soganli site
2012 Goreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia. Map showing the subterranean city of Kaymakli
2012 Goreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia. Map showing the subterranean city of Derinkuyu
Decisions
2013 37COM 8E - Adoption of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value
2012 36COM 8D - Clarifications of property boundaries and areas by States Parties in response to the Retrospective Inventory
1994 18BUR VIB - Göreme National Park and the rock sites of Cappadocia (Turkey)
1992 16COM VIII - SOC: Goreme National Park and the Rock Sites of Cappadocia (Turkey)
1992 16BUR VI.38 - State of conservation
1988 12COM XB.41-43 - SOC: Old Quebec (Canada), Goreme (Turkey) & Studenica Monastery (Yugoslavia)
1987 11COM VIII.12-15 - Monitoring of the State of Conservation of the World Heritage Cultural Properties
1985 Report of the 9th Session of the Committee
Periodic Reporting
2014 Periodic Reporting Cycle 2, Section II
2006 Periodic Reporting Cycle 1, Section II (Summary)
State of conservation reports
1994 State of conservation reports
1992 State of conservation reports
1988 State of conservation reports
Disclaimer

The Nomination files produced by the States Parties are published by the World Heritage Centre at its website and/or in working documents in order to ensure transparency, access to information and to facilitate the preparations of comparative analysis by other nominating States Parties.

The sole responsibility for the content of each Nomination file lies with the State Party concerned. The publication of the Nomination file does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever of the World Heritage Committee or of the Secretariat of UNESCO concerning the history or legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its boundaries.

top