State of Conservation
9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2010close
Date end:2010close
Region:
Africaclose
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | b) Growing number of collapsed or seriously dilapidated buildings; |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | f) Extremely poor state of conservation of numerous derelict buildings endangering occupants; |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Lack of adequate sewerage, waste disposal, and overall infrastructure, and risk to limited fresh water supplies; Fire |
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Zambia Zimbabwe |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | c) Deterioration of dwellings |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | h) Geological and architectural characteristics of the churches. |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | a) Inappropriate design and scale of new Ahmed Baba Cultural Centre in the vicinity of the Sankoré Mosque; lack of detailed drawings supplied to the Committee; |
States Parties
Ethiopia Kenya Mali Mozambique Senegal South Africa United Republic of Tanzania Zambia ZimbabweThreats
Housing 9
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.