State of Conservation
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Fire |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | State of abandonment and degradation |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Site in a state of quasi-total abandon and greatly degraded |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Decline of the seal population; b) Forest fires |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the environment |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Heritage badly maintained |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Australia Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Cambodia Central African Republic China Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Dominican Republic Ecuador Ethiopia Germany Greece Guatemala Guinea Haiti Honduras India Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Mali Malta Mexico Morocco Nepal Niger North Macedonia Oman Pakistan Peru Philippines Romania Russian Federation Senegal Slovenia Solomon Islands Spain Sri Lanka Türkiye Turkmenistan United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)Threats
Legal framework 167
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.