State of Conservation
35
Reports
35
Properties concerned
27
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2001close
Date end:2001close
| States Parties: |
 Egypt
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Risk of collapse |
| States Parties: |
 Sri Lanka
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Air transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Mauritania
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Nepal
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Germany
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Cameroon
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Spain
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Marine transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Decline of the Iberian lynx and Imperial eagle populations |
| States Parties: |
 Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Russian Federation
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Australia
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 India
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Viet Nam
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Marine transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Rapid economic development |
| States Parties: |
 Canada
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Peru
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Peru
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Brazil
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Nepal
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
| States Parties: |
Egypt
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
| States Parties: |
 Dominica
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
| Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Australia Brazil Cameroon Canada Côte d'Ivoire Dominica Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Germany Guinea Honduras India Jordan Lebanon Mauritania Nepal Pakistan Peru Russian Federation Senegal Spain Sri Lanka United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
