State of Conservation
28
Reports
28
Properties concerned
24
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2011close
Date end:2011close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
agra fortAgra Fort | india |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
centennial hall in wrocławCentennial Hall in Wrocław | poland |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
complex of hue monumentsComplex of Hué Monuments | viet nam |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
dong phayayen-khao yai forest complexDong Phayayen-Khao Yai Forest Complex | thailand |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
No |
fatehpur sikriFatehpur Sikri | india |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
golden mountains of altaiGolden Mountains of Altai | russian federation |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic areas of istanbulHistoric Areas of Istanbul | turkiye |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: a) Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); |
No |
historic centre of the city of salzburgHistoric Centre of the City of Salzburg | austria |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historic monuments of ancient naraHistoric Monuments of Ancient Nara | japan |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
historical centre of the city of arequipaHistorical Centre of the City of Arequipa | peru |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
kaziranga national parkKaziranga National Park | india |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
los katios national parkLos Katíos National Park | colombia |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
manu national parkManú National Park | peru |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
national history park – citadel, sans souci, ramiersNational History Park – Citadel, Sans Souci, Ramiers | haiti |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
niokolo-koba national parkNiokolo-Koba National Park | senegal |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve | democratic republic of the congo |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
samarkand – crossroad of culturesSamarkand – Crossroad of Cultures | uzbekistan |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
serengeti national parkSerengeti National Park | united republic of tanzania |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
simien national parkSimien National Park | ethiopia |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Declining populations of Walia ibex, Ethiopian wolf and other large mammal species |
Yes |
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
taj mahalTaj Mahal | india |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
talamanca range-la amistad reserves / la amistad national parkTalamanca Range-La Amistad Reserves / La Amistad National Park | costa rica,panama |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
tokaj wine region historic cultural landscapeTokaj Wine Region Historic Cultural Landscape | hungary |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
tropical rainforest heritage of sumatraTropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra | indonesia |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
tyreTyre | lebanon |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Insufficient maintenance |
No |
upper middle rhine valleyUpper Middle Rhine Valley | germany |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape | lao people's democratic republic |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
western caucasusWestern Caucasus | russian federation |
2011 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.