Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

36
Reports
12
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Mixedclose
Date end:1996close
Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1987)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1
Threats*: Financial resources Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1986)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 1986
Document Source: CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4
Threats*: Financial resources Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1985)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 1985
Document Source: SC-85/CONF.008/9
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1984)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC-84/CONF.001/4,SC/84/CONF.004/4
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Ngorongoro Conservation Area (1983)
States Parties: United Republic of Tanzania
Year: 1983
Document Source: SC/83/CONF.009/8
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Río Abiseo National Park (1994)
States Parties: Peru
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Other Threats: Fire; Lack of regular vigilance and inspection; Deterioration of the archaeological remains
Tasmanian Wilderness (1996)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.202/2B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production Ground transport infrastructure
Tasmanian Wilderness (1995)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Forestry /wood production Ground transport infrastructure
Tasmanian Wilderness (1994)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Tasmanian Wilderness (1987)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1987
Document Source: SC-87/CONF.005/INF.1
Threats*: Forestry /wood production
Tasmanian Wilderness (1984)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1984
Document Source: SC/84/CONF.004/7,SC/84/CONF.004/9
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Tasmanian Wilderness (1983)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1983
Document Source: SC/83/CONF.009/INF.5
Threats*: Water infrastructure
Tikal National Park (1993)
States Parties: Guatemala
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Tongariro National Park (1995)
States Parties: New Zealand
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Invasive/alien terrestrial species Management activities
Willandra Lakes Region (1995)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Willandra Lakes Region (1994)
States Parties: Australia
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.1
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Problems with landowners resident in the site and aboriginal concerns
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Australia China Greece Guatemala New Zealand Peru Türkiye United Republic of Tanzania
Threats
Management systems/ management plan 21 Forestry /wood production 6 Ground transport infrastructure 4 Water infrastructure 4 Financial resources 4 Mining 3 Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation 3 Major visitor accommodation and associated infrastructure 2 Crop production 2 Housing 1 Major linear utilities 1 Input of excess energy 1 Solid waste 1 Land conversion 1 Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals 1 Fire (widlfires) 1 Invasive/alien terrestrial species 1 Management activities 1

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top