Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

Ngorongoro Conservation Area

United Republic of Tanzania
Factors affecting the property in 1987*
  • Financial resources
  • Management systems/ management plan
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports

Shortcomings in the management

International Assistance: requests for the property until 1987
Requests approved: 8 (from 1979-1987)
Total amount approved : 98,850 USD
Missions to the property until 1987**
Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 1987

Support for equipment provided by the World Heritage Fund has arrived and put to immediate use.

IUCN has also secured funds and is working with the Authority and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism to do a land use evaluation and policy study of the area.

IUCN has also helped arrange a tech­nical exchange programme between the NCA and the Countryside Commission of the UK. A workshop will be held early in 1988 at which time a recommendation on its threatened status will be made.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 1987

The prospects for removing this property from the danger list are improving.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 1987
11 COM VIII.17
SOC: Djoudj National Park (Senegal), Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania) & Garamba National Park (Zaire)

17. The Committee noted with satisfaction that the situation in two of the natural sites inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger - namely Djoudj National Park (Senegal) and Ngorongoro Conservation Area (Tanzania) - had considerably improved in the last year and that IUCN would be proposing that they be removed from the List of World Heritage in Danger in the next two years. The situation of Garamba National Park (Zaire) was also improving but was still critical.

No draft Decision

Report year: 1987
United Republic of Tanzania
Date of Inscription: 1979
Category: Mixed
Criteria: (iv)(vii)(viii)(ix)(x)
Danger List (dates): 1984-1989
Documents examined by the Committee
arrow_circle_right 11COM (1987)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top