State of Conservation
85
Reports
25
Properties concerned
16
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
2011close
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties: | India |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Uzbekistan |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Lack of systematic monitoring of the site |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Haiti |
Year: |
2023
Initialy proposed for examination in 2022
|
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Haiti |
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Document Source: | WHC/21/44.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Haiti |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Haiti |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Haiti |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.