State of Conservation
32
Reports
32
Properties concerned
27
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2000close
Date end:2000close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Marine transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for more effective catchment management in lands adjacent to the Park |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure Marine transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Risks linked to addressing environmental impacts of individual projects to the neglect of monitoring cumulative impacts of the overall development of Ha Long City and other areas surrounding the World Heritage area |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Underground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need to monitor movements which could affect the structure of the building |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Accident of a crane which damaged one of the most important monuments at Machu Picchu, the Intihuatana or stone sundial |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/INF.4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10,WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.21,WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.22 |
Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Australia Brazil Cameroon China Côte d'Ivoire Ecuador Ethiopia Germany Guinea Honduras India Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Mexico Morocco Nepal Oman Pakistan Peru Portugal Russian Federation Senegal Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.