State of Conservation
390
Reports
87
Properties concerned
53
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start:
1995close
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2019 |
Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | rural poverty |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2024 |
Document Source: | WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add.4 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Decay and loss of Ottoman/vernacular architecture; Impact of change of status of the Hagia Sophia and the Chora Museum |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2023 |
Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | decay and loss of Ottoman/vernacular architecture |
States Parties: |
|
Year: |
2021
Initialy proposed for examination in 2020
|
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | decay and loss of Ottoman/vernacular architecture |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2018 |
Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | decay and loss of Ottoman/vernacular architecture |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2017 |
Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project |
States Parties: |
|
Year: | 2015 |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected zones (particularly Ottoman-period timber houses in the Zeyrek and Süleymaniye core areas); Land Reclamation project |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Austria Bahrain Belgium Brazil Chile China Colombia Cyprus Czechia Egypt France Germany Ghana Haiti Hungary India Indonesia Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lithuania Malta Mauritius Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Nigeria Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Russian Federation Slovakia Spain Sudan Sweden Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Uzbekistan Viet Nam Yemen
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.