State of Conservation
States Parties: | South Africa |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Natural values and cultural landscape qualities are not yet reflected in the islands management structure and conservation priorities |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Indonesia |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Slovenia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Risks of collapse |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Australia |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Lack of capacities in conservation techniques |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Interpretative and visitation facilities |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Brazil Cambodia China Cyprus Dominican Republic Egypt Ethiopia Germany Greece Indonesia Italy Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Libya Mali Malta Morocco Paraguay Poland Slovenia South Africa Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.