State of Conservation
19
Reports
13
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:1996close
States Parties: | Albania |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for monitoring of the situation at the site |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the site |
States Parties: | Ecuador |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Steady deterioration of the city's pysical environment; Large-scale rehabilitation project for the Hermitage |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Mozambique |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Precarious state of conservation of the stone |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Zimbabwe |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for structural stabilization and repair of collapsed sections of walls |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Haiti |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Consolidation of the Sans Souci Palace and rehabilitation of the Royal Gardens required |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Lack of maintenance ; Halt of site excavations |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.4,WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Mali |
Year: | 1990 |
Document Source: | CC-90/CONF.004/2,CC-90/CONF.004/3 Add. |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Vulnerability of the mosques |
States Parties: | Lithuania |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Financial resources |
Other Threats: | Need for a comprehensive rehabilitation programme |
States Parties
Albania China Ecuador Germany Haiti Lithuania Mali Mozambique Nepal Peru Russian Federation ZimbabweThreats
Financial resources 19
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.