State of Conservation
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
States Parties: | Yemen |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | b) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tomb; |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | a) Significant decay of the property caused by local climatic conditions and alluvial erosionb) Stability of the foundations (earth mechanics) of the Jam Nizamuddin tombd) Lack of monitoring |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | Significant decay of the property caused by the local climatic conditions |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | poor state of conservation |
States Parties: | Georgia |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Georgia |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Georgia |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Georgia |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Georgia |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | f) Loss of authenticity |
States Parties: | Tunisia |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | Excessive salinity of the water |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Tunisia |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | Excessive salinity of the water |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Tunisia |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | Excessive salinity of the water |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Tunisia |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9,WHC-99/CONF.204/INF.11 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | Excessive salinity of the water |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | risk of collapse of historic building |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Erosion and siltation/ deposition |
Other Threats: | Risk of collapse of historic buildings; |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.