State of Conservation
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7A,WHC-96/CONF.201/INF.14,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Neglected Park infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Philippines |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/18 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Philippines |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.5,WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Philippines |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Philippines |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Growing energy demands of the tourist industry |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Growing energy demands of the tourist industry |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Threats to wildlife migration and populations |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Threats to wildlife migration and populations |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Lack of vegetation control |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Lack of vegetation control |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Cuba |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties
Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Brazil Bulgaria China Croatia Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia France Germany Greece Guatemala India Indonesia Italy Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Mauritania Montenegro Morocco Nepal Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Romania Russian Federation Spain Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.