State of Conservation
States Parties: | Bulgaria |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Wind |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Wind |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Wind |
States Parties: | Guatemala |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Wind |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Wind |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Wind |
Other Threats: | destabilisation of one of the main structures |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Wind |
Other Threats: | Growth of native vegetation (Pinkuyo), the roots of which destabilize the foundations |
States Parties: | Chile |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Wind |
States Parties: | Chile |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Wind |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/10 |
Threats*: | Wind |
States Parties: | Ghana |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Wind |
Other Threats: | Salt-laden atmosphere |
States Parties: | Ghana |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Wind |
Other Threats: | Salt-laden atmosphere |
States Parties: | Sudan |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Wind |
States Parties: | Sudan |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Wind |
States Parties: | Georgia |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Wind |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Wind |
Other Threats: | Significant decay of the property caused by the local climatic conditions |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Wind |
Other Threats: | poor state of conservation |
States Parties: | Chile |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Wind |
Other Threats: | Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction ; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings such as the Leaching House are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried out |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Chile |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Wind |
Other Threats: | Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction ; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried out |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Chile |
Year: | 2009 |
Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Wind |
Other Threats: | Extremely fragile nature of the industrial buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, in addition to stucco and lightweight construction ; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Corrosion of metal cladding and dismantlement of some of the structural elements. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried out |
Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.