State of Conservation
28
Reports
28
Properties concerned
26
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
2007close
Date end:2007close
States Parties: | Belgium France |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Viet Nam |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Thailand |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Forest fragmentationNeed for ecological corridors |
States Parties: | Germany |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Türkiye |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Continued degradation of the vernacular architecture within the protected areas (mainly the Ottoman period timber houses in the district of Zeyrek and Süleymaniye) |
States Parties: | Czechia |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Austria |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Japan |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Chile |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Other Threats: | Extremely fragile nature of the buildings that were constructed using local materials such as timber for frames, corrugated iron sheets for roofs and some walls, and stucco and lightweight construction that functioned with regular maintenance; Lack of maintenance over the past 40 years ; Metal cladding corroded and some of the structural elements dismantled. A few buildings, such as the Leaching house, are liable to structural collapse if no support is given ; Very little conservation work carried ou |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Brazil |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Peru |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Montenegro |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Senegal |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A,WHC/17/41.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Bahrain |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties: | Italy |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Ground transport infrastructure |
States Parties
Australia Austria Bahrain Belgium Brazil Chile Czechia Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia France Germany India Indonesia Italy Japan Montenegro Peru Russian Federation Senegal Thailand Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Uzbekistan Viet Nam
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.