State of Conservation
States Parties: | Romania |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add.2 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2015 |
Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7A.Add,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7,WHC-15/39.COM/INF.7Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2013 |
Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Disappointment, confusion, suspicion, division and anger within the community |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Solomon Islands |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Iraq |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Slopes of the archaeological mound non stabilized |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2014 |
Document Source: | WHC-14/38.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2012 |
Document Source: | WHC-12/36.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2011 |
Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2010 |
Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2008 |
Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of capacity in conservation techniques; b) Lack of monitoring system |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Need for consolidation and conservation measures of the hydraulic work |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Panama |
Year: | 2016 |
Document Source: | WHC/16/40.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Fragile state of the property and accelerated degradation by environmental factors, lack of maintenance and limited conservation planning |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties
Afghanistan Albania Algeria Andorra Australia Austria Belize Benin Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia Central African Republic Chile China Colombia Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Dominican Republic Ecuador Ethiopia Fiji France Germany Greece Guatemala Guinea Haiti Honduras Hungary India Indonesia Iraq Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Lithuania Mali Malta Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Niger North Macedonia Oman Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Romania Russian Federation Saint Lucia Senegal Serbia Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa Spain Sri Lanka Suriname Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Türkiye Turkmenistan Ukraine United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania Uzbekistan Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) YemenThreats
Legal framework 363
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.