Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve

Côte d'Ivoire, Guinea
Factors affecting the property in 2024*
  • Financial resources
  • Ground transport infrastructure
  • Human resources
  • Identity, social cohesion, changes in local population and community
  • Illegal activities
  • Land conversion
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Mining
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Mining
  • Influx of refugees
  • Agricultural encroachment
  • Deforestation
  • Poaching
  • Weak management capacity
  • Lack of resources
  • Unsatisfactory transboundary cooperation
  • Road construction
Threats for which the property was inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger
  • Iron-ore mining concession inside the property in Guinea
  • Arrival of large numbers of refugees from Liberia to areas in and around the Reserve
  • Insufficient institutional structure 
Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger
Corrective Measures for the property
Timeframe for the implementation of the corrective measures

Proposed for adoption in the 2024-2025 Costed Action Plan

UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2024

Total amount granted:  USD 25,282 from the Rapid Response Facility in January 2012 (see page https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/830/), USD 31,214 from the Government of China Funds for Capacity Building and cooperation for World Heritage in Africa (https://whc.unesco.org/en/280/?id=1058&&&)

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2024
Requests approved: 23 (from 1981-2024)
Total amount approved : 570,039 USD
2024 Renforcement des patrouilles de surveillance et de ... (Approved)   29,390 USD
2019 Elaboration de cartes à haute résolution à partir des ... (Approved)   28,061 USD
2015 Appui à la capitalisation des acquis du programme de ... (Approved)   27,000 USD
2014 Protection de la biodiversité de la Réserve naturelle ... (Approved)   20,366 USD
2010 Atelier international bipartite sur la gestion durable ... (Approved)   30,000 USD
2002 Mount Nimba Biodiversity Conservation project (Approved)   30,000 USD
2001 Training workshop for awarenes raising on the Mount ... (Approved)   10,000 USD
2001 Réunion tripartite Guinée-Côte d'Ivoire-Libéria sur les ... (Approved)   20,000 USD
2000 Evaluation mission to mount Nimba World Heritage site ... (Approved)   30,000 USD
1997 Purchase of hydrological and meteorological equipment ... (Approved)   19,840 USD
1995 Establishment of an administrative centre for Mount ... (Approved)   18,000 USD
1993 Equipment and experts service for Mount Nimba (Approved)   45,000 USD
1993 Financial contribution for consultancies and other ... (Approved)   30,000 USD
1993 Consultancies and other services necessary for setting ... (Approved)   30,000 USD
1992 Organization of an interdisciplinary mission to ... (Approved)   35,000 USD
1992 Organization of a technical meeting for authorities of ... (Approved)   19,500 USD
1989 Purchase of an all terrain vehicle for Mount Nimba (Approved)   20,000 USD
1988 Consultancy mission and meeting for preparing ... (Approved)   15,000 USD
1986 Equipment for Mount Nimba Reserve (Approved)   6,500 USD
1983 Financial contribution to a seminar/workshop on the ... (Approved)   22,000 USD
1983 Consultant services to prepare requests for technical ... (Approved)   6,082 USD
1982 Financial contribution to a tripartite meeting (Guinea, ... (Approved)   8,000 USD
1981 Equipment for Mount Nimba (Approved)   70,300 USD
Missions to the property until 2024**

October/November 1988: World Heritage Centre mission; 1993: Joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN mission; 1994: IUCN mission; 2000: World Heritage Centre mission; 2007: Joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN mission to Guinea; 2008: Joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN mission to Côte d’Ivoire; 2013: Joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN mission; January 2019: Joint World Heritage Centre/IUCN Reactive Monitoring mission to Côte d’Ivoire and Guinea

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2024

On 31 January 2024, the States Parties of Côte d'Ivoire and Guinea submitted a joint state of conservation report of the property, available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/155/documents/, reporting the following:

  • The implementation of the corrective measures, in particular surveillance, ecological monitoring, support for neighbouring populations, strengthening of management capacities, ecological monitoring, fight against poaching, restoration of degraded areas, fight against bush fires, among others, as well as transboundary activities, is continuing in the two States Parties with the financial and technical support of several partners;
  • The Development and Management Plan (plan d’aménagement et de gestion - PAG) for the Ivorian component of the property was validated in May 2022, while the PAG for the Guinean component is currently being finalised. The Master Plan for the two protected areas will follow;
  • In Côte d'Ivoire, the Makoré Project will finance the management costs of five protected areas, including the Mount Nimba Reserve, for two years from 2024. It will also add 15 million euros to the endowment fund of the Foundation for the Parks and Reserves of Côte d'Ivoire (Fondation pour les Parcs et Réserves de Côte d’Ivoire - FPRCI), ensuring sustainable funding for the recurrent costs of the five protected areas from the third year;
  • Infrastructure development in the peripheral zone of national parks and nature reserves in Côte d'Ivoire is regulated by strict legal provisions, in particular Law 2002‑102 of 11 February 2002;
  • In 2022, the Support Programme for the Preservation of Forest Ecosystems in West Africa (Programme d'Appui à la Préservation des Ecosystèmes Forestiers en Afrique de l'Ouest - PAPFor) made it possible to monitor five community forests and to draw up six local development plans for the villages bordering the reserve. The formalisation and training of Village Conservation and Development Associations (Associations Villageoises de Conservation et de Développement) began in 2023 and will continue in 2024 with new micro-projects;
  • The Côte d’Ivoire Parks and Reserves Office (Office Ivoirien des Parcs et Réserves - OIPR), with the support of UNESCO, organised a workshop in Conakry in December 2023 to assess the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSCOR) and to draw up a plan for the removal of the Mount Nimba Reserve from the List of World Heritage in Danger, including recommendations and a costed action plan;
  • Following the adoption of the DSOCR at the extended 45th session of the Committee, major efforts, although slowed by the late start of the PAPFor and the lack of recent specific studies on certain key species, have been deployed to achieve the indicators for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger, including the strengthening of operational capacities, transboundary collaboration, surveillance patrols and support for neighbouring populations;
  • Pending the full update of the Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment (SESA) of the mining sector in Guinea, draft Technical Criteria for assessing the acceptability of mining projects based on their potential individual and cumulative impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property are being prepared and will be submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by IUCN as soon as possible;
  • The control and monitoring of the implementation of the necessary measures to manage the impacts of the Lola-N'zo - Danané road project crossing the buffer zone of the Mounts Nimba Biosphere Reserve (Réserve de Biosphère des Monts Nimba - RBMN) is ensured by a Framework Collaboration Agreement between the Mounts Nimba-Simandou Environmental Management Centre (Centre de Gestion de l'Environnement des Monts Nimba-Simandou - CEGENS) and the Ministry of Transport and Road Infrastructure.

On 25 April 2024, the State Party of Guinea submitted to the World Heritage Centre a Brief Description of Phase 1 of the Nimba Mining Project of the Société des Mines de Fer de Guinée (SMFG), which was reviewed by IUCN, the comments of which were transmitted to the State Party by the World Heritage Centre. On 28 May 2024, SMFG, a company in which the State Party of Guinea is a shareholder, announced that the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development of the Republic of Guinea had issued approvals for the terms of reference (ToR) and the scoping documents for the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) for the development of Phase 1 of the Nimba Iron Ore Project.

In December 2023, the States Parties attended a workshop in Conakry, Guinea, to assess the implementation of the DSOCR and produce a costed action plan.

Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2024

Despite irregular and insufficient funding and limited management capacity, the States Parties have made significant progress in implementing certain corrective measures, including surveillance, ecological monitoring, support for neighbouring populations and transboundary activities. These efforts are commendable and must be continued.

The obvious interest shown by several technical and financial partners through several projects and programmes, in particular UNESCO, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the European Union (EU) and the World Bank, in supporting the States Parties in improving the state of conservation of the property and achieving the DSOCR indicators is to be welcomed and should be encouraged. Despite the delay in starting up, the continued effective implementation of all the components of the PAPFor to support the management functions of the property is appreciated. However, there has been a delay in the process of validating the PAG for the Guinean component of the property and the Master Plan including the two components of the property. It is recommended that the States Parties provide detailed information on the progress of these two processes. Although efforts are being made to monitor key species that represent major attributes of the OUV of the property, notably the chimpanzee, the Micropotamogale and the viviparous toad, the data remains very disparate from one component to another, with data almost non-existent in the Guinean component, the major part of the property. This is even more worrying for the Micropotamogale, for which there is currently no reliable data on the status of this species in the property. As a follow-up to the Conakry workshop in December 2023, it is recommended that a harmonised and operational ecological monitoring and anti-poaching system be developed and implemented as soon as possible to monitor the trend of key species of the OUV of the property and the integrity of their habitats.

The regulatory framework for infrastructure development in the peripheral zone of national parks and nature reserves in Côte d'Ivoire, particularly Law 2002‑102 of 11 February 2002, which allows the management body to play an important role in decision-making, is noted. However, given the specificities related to the preservation of the OUV of the property in a World Heritage context, it is recommended that the Committee once again reiterate its request to the State Party of Côte d'Ivoire to ensure that the forests in the vicinity of the property are officially designated as a buffer zone under the World Heritage Convention by following the procedure for minor boundary modifications with reference to Paragraphs 107 and 164 of the Operational Guidelines.

Concerning the mining projects, for which potential individual and cumulative impacts on the OUV of the property, mainly in the Guinean component, remain of particular concern, it is noted, on the one hand, that the State Party of Guinea has not made significant progress on the new assessment framework for mining proposals in the Nimba region as an alternative to an SEA, as already reported in 2023, and, on the other hand, that it does not provide any additional information regarding the submission to the World Heritage Centre of the approved version of the draft ToR for the update of the ESIA of Zali Mining SA. It is therefore recommended that the Committee reiterate its request to the State Party of Guinea to submit the approved ToR of Zali Mining SA to the World Heritage Centre before any decision is taken on this project. With regard to the Nimba Iron Ore Mining Project by SMFG, the State Party does not provide any clarification regarding the completion of the ESIA for the entire project as requested by the Committee in its previous decisions, including Decision 45 COM 7A.4.

In reviewing the Brief Description of Phase 1 of the project, IUCN notes that the project, although only partially described, suggests several potential threats to the surrounding ecosystems in general and the OUV of the property in particular, due to the proximity of the project area and its associated infrastructure to the property and to the route of the ore transport line. It should be reminded that the SMFG mining concession is an enclave completely surrounded by the property and includes critical areas for the viviparous toad, an endemic and flagship species of Mounts Nimba. It is noted with great concern that the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development of the Republic of Guinea has issued approvals for the ToR and the scoping documents of the ESIA for the development of Phase 1 of the Nimba Iron Ore Project. While recalling SMFG's commitment to carry out a full ESIA in accordance with international standards, to be independently assessed by IUCN, before taking any decision that would be difficult to reverse, it is essential that no environmental compliance certificate be issued for the SMFG's project until the impacts of the entire project have been subject to an ESIA carried out in accordance with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage context.

In view of the potential impacts of the various mining projects on the OUV of the property, it should also be recalled that an SEA in this context would provide the framework to ensure a strategic level assessment of the potential cumulative impacts of the various mining projects on the OUV. It is recommended that the Committee reiterate, once again, its request to the State Party of Guinea not to grant any mining permits near the property without carrying out an SEA, conducted in accordance with international standards, and submitting it to the World Heritage Centre.

The involvement of CEGENS in controlling and monitoring the implementation of the necessary impact management measures for the Lola-N'zo - Danané road project, which crosses the buffer zone of the property, is positive. However, in view of the potential direct and indirect impacts of this project on the OUV of the property, particularly in the Guinean component, it is recommended that the States Parties provide detailed information on the progress of this project and its current route and ensure that these impacts are assessed in accordance with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage context before any decision is taken.

Finally, it is recommended that the Committee retain the property on the List of World Heritage in Danger.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2024
46 COM 7A.45
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (Côte d’Ivoire/Guinea) (N 155bis)

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7A.Add.2,
  2. Recalling Decisions 43 COM 7A.6, 44 COM 7A.40 and 45 COM 7A.4 adopted at its 43rd (Baku, 2019), extended 44th (Fuzhou/online, 2021) and extended 45th (Riyadh, 2023) sessions respectively,
  3. Notes with appreciation the ongoing efforts of the States Parties under difficult circumstances to implement the corrective measures, including joint transboundary surveillance patrols, funding to support management operations, surveillance, ecological monitoring, support for neighbouring populations and transboundary activities, and the restoration of degraded areas, and requests the States Parties to continue the implementation of all corrective measures to improve the state of conservation of the property;
  4. Appreciates the support by a growing number of national and international partners to the conservation of the property, including UNESCO, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the European Union (EU) and the World Bank, and encourages States Parties to build long-term programmes with them, including actions contributing to the achievement of the indicators of the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR), and to explore other funding opportunities for a sustainable maintenance of the ecological integrity of the property;
  5. Notes with concern the limited progress made in the process of validating the Development and Management Plan (Plan d’aménagement et de gestion - PAG) for the Guinean part of the property as well as the Master Plan including the two components of the property, and also requests the States Parties to provide detailed information on the progress of these two processes and to ensure that these processes are finalised as soon as possible;
  6. Also notes with concern that ecological monitoring data for key species representing the attributes of the OUV of the property, notably the chimpanzee, the Micropotamogale and the viviparous toad remain highly disparate from one component to another, expresses its concern about the lack of reliable data on the status of the Micropotamogale in the property and further requests the States Parties to develop and implement, as soon as possible, a harmonised and operational ecological monitoring and anti-poaching system to monitor the evolutionary trend of key species of the OUV of the property and the integrity of their habitats;
  7. Also takes note of the regulatory framework for infrastructure development in the peripheral zone of national parks and nature reserves in Côte d'Ivoire, recalls the importance for the property of having a buffer zone as described in the Operational Guidelines and reiterates once again its request to the State Party of Côte d'Ivoire to designate and formalize a buffer zone for the Ivorian component of the property in accordance with the procedures of the Operational Guidelines;
  8. Welcoming the involvement of the Mounts Nimba-Simandou Environmental Management Centre (Centre de Gestion de l'Environnement des Monts Nimba-Simandou - CEGENS) in controlling and monitoring the implementation of the necessary impact management measures for the Lola-N'zo - Danané road project, which crosses the buffer zone of the property in the Guinean component, also expresses its serious concern about the potential direct and indirect impacts of this project on the OUV of the property and urges the States Parties to provide as soon as possible detailed information on the progress of this project and its current route, and to ensure that these impacts are assessed in accordance with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage context before any decision is taken;
  9. Regrets that the State Party of Guinea has not provided any additional information concerning the submission to the World Heritage Centre of the approved version of the draft Terms of Reference (ToR) for the update of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) of Zali Mining SA and reiterates its request to the State Party to submit the approved ToR to the World Heritage Centre before any decision is taken;
  10. Recalling the commitment of the Société des Mines de Fer de Guinée (SMFG) to carry out a full ESIA of the project in accordance with international standards, to be independently assessed by IUCN, before taking any decision that would be difficult to reverse, notes with the greatest concern that the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development of the Republic of Guinea has issued approvals for the ToR and the scoping documents of the ESIA for the development of Phase 1 of the Nimba Iron Ore Project, despite its potential impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property as indicated by the assessment of the Brief Description of Phase 1 of the project, and further requests the State Party of Guinea to ensure that no environmental compliance certificate is issued for this mining project until its full potential impacts have been the subject of an ESIA;
  11. Also reiterates its request to the State Party of Guinea to ensure that the ESIAs for the Nimba Iron Ore Project and the Zali Mining Iron Project:
    1. are carried out in accordance with the highest international standards, in line with the new Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage context, and in close consultation with all key stakeholders,
    2. identify fully and quantify the potential effects of the project on the OUV of the property, at each phase of its cycle, including construction and operation, taking into account the synergistic and collateral impacts also linked to the on-site transformation of the ore and its transport, as well as the socio-economic changes to be expected,
    3. are submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by IUCN prior to any decision to approve the project;
  12. Notes with concern the potential individual and cumulative impacts of mining projects on the OUV of the property, mainly in the Guinean component, and also reiterates its request to the State Party of Guinea not to grant any new exploration or mining permits around the property without carrying out a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) to assess the impacts, including synergistic and cumulative impacts of these projects, and submitting it for prior consideration by the World Heritage Centre and for review by IUCN, and to provide further clarification regarding the planned World Bank strategic assessment of all mining projects in Guinea, in relation to the OUV of the property;
  13. Requests moreover the States Parties to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2025, a joint updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session;
  14. Decides to retain Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (Côte d'Ivoire, Guinea) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Draft Decision: 46 COM 7A.45

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined Document WHC/24/46.COM/7A.Add.2,
  2. Recalling Decisions 43 COM 7A.6, 44 COM 7A.40 and 45 COM 7A.4, adopted at its 43rd (Baku, 2019), extended 44th (Fuzhou/online, 2021) and extended 45th (Riyadh, 2023) sessions respectively,
  3. Notes with appreciation the ongoing efforts of the States Parties under difficult circumstances to implement the corrective measures, including joint transboundary surveillance patrols, funding to support management operations, surveillance, ecological monitoring, support for neighbouring populations and transboundary activities, and the restoration of degraded areas, and requests the States Parties to continue the implementation of all corrective measures to improve the state of conservation of the property;
  4. Appreciates the support by a growing number of national and international partners to the conservation of the property, including UNESCO, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the Global Environment Facility (GEF), the European Union (EU) and the World Bank, and encourages States Parties to build long-term programmes with them, including actions contributing to the achievement of the indicators of the Desired state of conservation for the removal of the property from the List of World Heritage in Danger (DSOCR), and to explore other funding opportunities for a sustainable maintenance of the ecological integrity of the property;
  5. Notes with concern the limited progress made in the process of validating the Development and Management Plan (Plan d’aménagement et de gestion - PAG) for the Guinean part of the property as well as the Master Plan including the two components of the property, and also requests the States Parties to provide detailed information on the progress of these two processes and to ensure that these processes are finalised as soon as possible;
  6. Also notes with concern that ecological monitoring data for key species representing the attributes of the OUV of the property, notably the chimpanzee, the Micropotamogale and the viviparous toad remain highly disparate from one component to another, expresses its concern about the lack of reliable data on the status of the Micropotamogale in the property and further requests the States Parties to develop and implement, as soon as possible, a harmonised and operational ecological monitoring and anti-poaching system to monitor the evolutionary trend of key species of the OUV of the property and the integrity of their habitats;
  7. Also takes note of the regulatory framework for infrastructure development in the peripheral zone of national parks and nature reserves in Côte d'Ivoire, recalls the importance for the property of having a buffer zone as described in the Operational Guidelines and reiterates once again its request to the State Party of Côte d'Ivoire to designate and formalize a buffer zone for the Ivorian component of the property in accordance with the procedures of the Operational Guidelines;
  8. While welcoming the involvement of the Mounts Nimba-Simandou Environmental Management Centre (Centre de Gestion de l'Environnement des Monts Nimba-Simandou - CEGENS) in controlling and monitoring the implementation of the necessary impact management measures for the Lola-N'zo - Danané road project, which crosses the buffer zone of the property in the Guinean component, also expresses its serious concern about the potential direct and indirect impacts of this project on the OUV of the property and urges the States Parties to provide as soon as possible detailed information on the progress of this project and its current route, and to ensure that these impacts are assessed in accordance with the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage context before any decision is taken;
  9. Regrets that the State Party of Guinea has not provided any additional information concerning the submission to the World Heritage Centre of the approved version of the draft Terms of Reference (ToR) for the update of the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) of Zali Mining SA and reiterates its request to the State Party to submit the approved ToR to the World Heritage Centre before any decision is taken;
  10. Recalling the commitment of the Société des Mines de Fer de Guinée (SMFG) to carry out a full ESIA of the project in accordance with international standards, to be independently assessed by IUCN, before taking any decision that would be difficult to reverse, notes with the greatest concern that the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development of the Republic of Guinea has issued approvals for the ToR and the scoping documents of the ESIA for the development of Phase 1 of the Nimba Iron Ore Project, despite its potential impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property as indicated by the assessment of the Brief Description of Phase 1 of the project, and further requests the State Party of Guinea to ensure that no environmental compliance certificate is issued for this mining project until its full potential impacts have been the subject of an ESIA;
  11. Also reiterates its request to the State Party of Guinea to ensure that the ESIAs for the Nimba Iron Ore Project and the Zali Mining Iron Project:
    1. are carried out in accordance with the highest international standards, in line with the new Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage context, and in close consultation with all key stakeholders,
    2. identify fully and quantify the potential effects of the project on the OUV of the property, at each phase of its cycle, including construction and operation, taking into account the synergistic and collateral impacts also linked to the on-site transformation of the ore and its transport, as well as the socio-economic changes to be expected,
    3. are submitted to the World Heritage Centre for review by IUCN prior to any decision to approve the project;
  12. Notes with concern the potential individual and cumulative impacts of mining projects on the OUV of the property, mainly in the Guinean component, and also reiterates its request to the State Party of Guinea not to grant any new exploration or mining permits around the property without carrying out a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) to assess the impacts, including synergistic and cumulative impacts of these projects, and submitting it for prior consideration by the World Heritage Centre and for review by IUCN, and to provide further clarification regarding the planned World Bank strategic assessment of all mining projects in Guinea, in relation to the OUV of the property;
  13. Requests moreover the States Parties to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2025, a joint updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session;
  14. Decides to retain Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (Côte d'Ivoire, Guinea) on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2024
Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Date of Inscription: 1981
Category: Natural
Criteria: (ix)(x)
Danger List (dates): 1992-present
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2024) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 46COM (2024)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top