State of Conservation
| States Parties: |
 Ecuador
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
Ecuador
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Portugal
|
| Year: | 2009 |
| Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | b) Lack of conservation of parks and palaces; |
| States Parties: |
 Romania
|
| Year: | 2005 |
| Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 India
|
| Year: | 2011 |
| Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
 Pakistan
|
| Year: | 2003 |
| Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 United States of America
|
| Year: | 2018 |
| Document Source: | WHC/18/42.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2023 |
| Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2019 |
| Document Source: | WHC/19/43.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2017 |
| Document Source: | WHC/17/41.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2015 |
| Document Source: | WHC-15/39.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2013 |
| Document Source: | WHC-13/37.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2011 |
| Document Source: | WHC-11/35.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2010 |
| Document Source: | WHC-10/34.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2009 |
| Document Source: | WHC-09/33.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2008 |
| Document Source: | WHC-08/32.COM/7B |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2001 |
| Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/09,WHC-01/CONF.208/9,WHC-2001/CONF.205/4 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| States Parties: |
India
|
| Year: | 2023 |
| Document Source: | WHC/23/45.COM/7B.Add |
| Threats*: | Effects arising from use of transportation infrastructure |
| Other Threats: | Vulnerabilities of certain individual structures within the forts requiring short-term conservation actions |
States Parties
Brazil Chad Chile China Colombia Denmark Ecuador Egypt Estonia Germany Greece Haiti Hungary India Iran (Islamic Republic of) Italy Lao People's Democratic Republic Malaysia Mauritania Montenegro Morocco Nepal New Zealand Oman Pakistan Peru Portugal Romania South Africa Spain Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uzbekistan
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
