State of Conservation
12
Reports
12
Properties concerned
12
States Parties with SOC reports
Date Start:
1994close
Date end:1994close
Site | State Party | Year | Threats* | Danger List |
---|---|---|---|---|
great barrier reefGreat Barrier Reef | australia Australia | 1994 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
memphis and its necropolis – the pyramid fields from giza to dahshurMemphis and its Necropolis – the Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur | egypt Egypt | 1994 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: Deterioration of the stones |
No |
mount athosMount Athos | greece Greece | 1994 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: chemical pollution |
No |
mount nimba strict nature reserveMount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve | cote d'ivoire,guinea Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
1994 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
old town of ávila with its extra-muros churchesOld Town of Ávila with its Extra-Muros Churches | spain Spain | 1994 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
pythagoreion and heraion of samosPythagoreion and Heraion of Samos | greece Greece | 1994 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
redwood national and state parksRedwood National and State Parks | united states of america United States of America | 1994 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
sangay national parkSangay National Park | ecuador Ecuador | 1994 | Ground transport infrastructure, | Yes |
site of palmyraSite of Palmyra | syrian arab republic Syrian Arab Republic | 1994 | Ground transport infrastructure,
Other Threats: serious weathering of many stone blocks |
No |
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites | united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | 1994 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
the great wallThe Great Wall | china China | 1994 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
xanthos-letoonXanthos-Letoon | turkiye Türkiye | 1994 | Ground transport infrastructure, | No |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.