State of Conservation
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Need for safeguarding and enhancement measures |
States Parties: | Greece |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Need for safeguarding and enhancement measures |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.); Partial collapse of a temple |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.) |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | CLT-92/CONF.003/2,WHC-92/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties: | Haiti |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Consolidation of the Sans Souci Palace and rehabilitation of the Royal Gardens required |
States Parties: | Albania North Macedonia |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Economic and demographic developments |
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7A |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add. |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Croatia |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 1982 |
Document Source: | CLT-82/CONF.014/3,CLT-82/CONF.014/6 |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
Other Threats: | Loss of historical authenticity |
States Parties: | Sri Lanka |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Legal framework |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Australia Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Cambodia Croatia Dominican Republic Ecuador Germany Greece Haiti Lao People's Democratic Republic Mali Malta Mexico North Macedonia Oman Peru Romania Russian Federation Slovenia Spain Sri LankaThreats
Legal framework 82
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.