State of Conservation
40
Reports
13
Properties concerned
10
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date end:2004close
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/INF.4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10,WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.21,WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.22 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.204/INF.19,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8A,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8B,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8C |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.202/INF.6,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B,WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.003/6 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the stones |
States Parties: | Lebanon |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
States Parties: | Philippines |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | General poor state of conservation |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.201/11Rev,WHC-02/CONF.202/17,WHC-02/CONF.202/2 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Gradual deterioration and the structural instability |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Land conversion |
Other Threats: | Gradual deterioration and the structural instability |
States Parties
Albania Egypt Ghana India Lebanon Nepal Pakistan Peru Philippines United Republic of TanzaniaThreats
Land conversion 40
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.