State of Conservation
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Growing energy demands of the tourist industry |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Egypt |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Spain |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Republic of Korea |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/7B.Corr |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Threats to wildlife migration and populations |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Threats to wildlife migration and populations |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | United Republic of Tanzania |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Lack of vegetation control |
States Parties: | Pakistan |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Lack of vegetation control |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | China |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | State of conservation of mosaics and other exposed structures |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2002 |
Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
Threats*: | Impacts of tourism / visitor / recreation |
Other Threats: | Deterioration of the archaeological vestiges |
States Parties
Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia China Croatia Cuba Czechia Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Estonia France Germany Greece Guatemala Honduras India Indonesia Italy Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Lithuania Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Nepal Pakistan Panama Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Republic of Korea Romania Russian Federation South Africa Spain Türkiye Uganda United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Uzbekistan Viet Nam Zambia Zimbabwe
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.