Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

245
Reports
53
Properties concerned
39
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 1991close
Threats* : Deliberate destruction of heritageclose
Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower (2006)
States Parties: Azerbaijan
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7A
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Danger List:  Yes
Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower (2005)
States Parties: Azerbaijan
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7A
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Danger List:  Yes
Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower (2004)
States Parties: Azerbaijan
Year: 2004
Document Source: WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Danger List:  Yes
Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower (2003)
States Parties: Azerbaijan
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/INF.7D
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower (2002)
States Parties: Azerbaijan
Year: 2002
Document Source: WHC-02/CONF.202/17
Threats*: Deliberate destruction of heritage
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Afghanistan Algeria Austria Azerbaijan Belarus Bulgaria Cambodia Chile China Egypt France Germany Haiti Hungary India Indonesia Iraq Italy Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Libya Lithuania Mali Malta Mauritania Mauritius Mexico Morocco Nepal Norway Pakistan Panama Peru Russian Federation Spain Syrian Arab Republic Türkiye Uzbekistan Yemen
Threats
Deliberate destruction of heritage 245

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top