Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
3
Properties concerned
4
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 1991close
Threats* : Surface water pollutionclose
Region: Europe and North Americaclose
Curonian Spit (2018)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2018
Document Source: WHC/18/42.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2016)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2012)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2012
Document Source: WHC-12/36.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2011)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2011
Document Source: WHC-11/35.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2010)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2010
Document Source: WHC-10/34.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2008)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2008
Document Source: WHC-08/32.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Curonian Spit (2007)
States Parties: Lithuania Russian Federation
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Garden Kingdom of Dessau-Wörlitz (2003)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Hortobágy National Park - the Puszta (2000)
States Parties: Hungary
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10
Threats*: Surface water pollution
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Germany Hungary Lithuania Russian Federation
Threats
Surface water pollution 9

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top