State of Conservation
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Zimbabwe |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Need for structural stabilization and repair of collapsed sections of walls |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Fire |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | Kenya |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | a) Fire; b) Lack of law enforcement |
States Parties: | Ethiopia |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties: | India |
Year: | 2005 |
Document Source: | WHC-05/29.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Destruction to park infrastructure |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Central African Republic |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Central African Republic |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Transhumance |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Central African Republic |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A,WHC.03/27.COM/7A.Corr |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Malta |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Worrying state of conservation of some temples; Fragility of the structures (cracks, etc.); Partial collapse of a temple |
States Parties: | Afghanistan |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A,WHC.03/27.COM/7A.Corr |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | Need for consolidation and restoration of the monument |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 2007 |
Document Source: | WHC-07/31.COM/7A.Add |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 2006 |
Document Source: | WHC-06/30.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Côte d'Ivoire Guinea |
Year: | 2003 |
Document Source: | WHC.03/27.COM/7A |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Democratic Republic of the Congo |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15A.Rev |
Threats*: | Human resources |
Other Threats: | a) Lack of maintenance; b) Natural factors |
Danger List: | Yes |
States Parties: | Bulgaria |
Year: | 2004 |
Document Source: | WHC-04/28.COM/15B |
Threats*: | Human resources |
States Parties
Afghanistan Algeria Argentina Australia Bangladesh Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Bulgaria Cambodia Canada Central African Republic Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt Ethiopia Germany Ghana Greece Guinea Honduras India Iraq Kenya Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Libya Mali Malta Mauritania Mexico Mozambique Nepal Niger Oman Pakistan Paraguay Peru Philippines Russian Federation Senegal Slovenia Solomon Islands South Africa Turkmenistan Uganda United Republic of Tanzania Viet Nam ZimbabweThreats
Human resources 147
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.