Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

204
Reports
69
Properties concerned
46
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2007close
Threats* : Management activitiesclose
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Buildings threatened with collapse
States Parties: Senegal
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: a) Hazardous condition of the buildingsb) Integrity of the propert
States Parties: Uzbekistan
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Uzbekistan
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.002/14
Threats*: Management activities
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2003
Document Source: WHC.03/27.COM/7B,WHC.03/27.COM/INF.7C
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2001
Document Source: WHC-01/CONF.208/10
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 2000
Document Source: WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/INF.4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10,WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.21,WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.22
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1999
Document Source: WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.204/INF.19,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8A,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8B,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8C
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1998
Document Source: WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.202/INF.6,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev.
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1997
Document Source: WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1996
Document Source: WHC-96/CONF.201/7B
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1995
Document Source: WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B,WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC-94/CONF.003/6
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1993
Document Source: WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1992
Document Source: WHC-92/CONF.002/12
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Nepal
Year: 1991
Document Source: SC-91/CONF.002/3
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Need for restoration/consolidation works
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2007
Document Source: WHC-07/31.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2006
Document Source: WHC-06/30.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: Structural integrity of the Church of the Transfiguration
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2005
Document Source: WHC-05/29.COM/7B.Rev
Threats*: Management activities
Other Threats: a) Structural integrity and stability of the Church of the Transfiguration; b) Deformation of wooden structures.

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top