State of Conservation
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.203/INF.4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10,WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.21,WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.22 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.204/INF.19,WHC-99/CONF.209/14,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8A,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8B,WHC.99/CONF.208/INF.8C |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.202/INF.6,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1995 |
Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1994 |
Document Source: | WHC-94/CONF.001/3B,WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1993 |
Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.001/3,WHC-93/CONF.002/5 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Nepal |
Year: | 1992 |
Document Source: | WHC-92/CONF.002/12 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for restoration/consolidation works |
States Parties: | Zimbabwe |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Need for structural stabilization and repair of collapsed sections of walls |
States Parties: | Ukraine |
Year: | 1999 |
Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5 |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Ukraine |
Year: | 1998 |
Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.207/INF.8,WHC-01/CONF.208/10,WHC-2001/CONF.205/5 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Continuing decline of the Baikal Seal population |
States Parties: | Russian Federation |
Year: | 2000 |
Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Argentina |
Year: | 1986 |
Document Source: | CC-86/CONF.001/11,CC-86/CONF.003/INF.4 |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Argentina |
Year: | 1985 |
Document Source: | SC-85/CONF.008/9 |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Algeria |
Year: | 2001 |
Document Source: | WHC-01/CONF.208/10 |
Threats*: | Housing |
Other Threats: | Degradation of the overall natural environment |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 1997 |
Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties: | Morocco |
Year: | 1996 |
Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
Threats*: | Housing |
States Parties
Algeria Argentina Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Brazil Canada China Democratic Republic of the Congo Dominican Republic Egypt Ethiopia France Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guatemala Holy See Hungary India Indonesia Jordan Lao People's Democratic Republic Lebanon Luxembourg Mauritania Mexico Montenegro Morocco Mozambique Nepal Peru Philippines Russian Federation Spain Sri Lanka Syrian Arab Republic Tunisia Ukraine United Republic of Tanzania United States of America Viet Nam Yemen ZimbabweThreats
Housing 166
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.