State of Conservation
12
Reports
4
Properties concerned
3
States Parties with SOC reports
Date end:2002close
Region:
Arab Statesclose
| States Parties: |
 Oman
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 1999 |
| Document Source: | WHC-99/CONF.204/5,WHC-99/CONF.209/14 |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 1998 |
| Document Source: | WHC-98/CONF.201/3B,WHC-98/CONF.203/8Rev. |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 1997 |
| Document Source: | WHC-97/CONF.204/2B,WHC-97/CONF.208/4B,WHC-97/CONF.208/8B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B,WHC-96/CONF.202/2B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
Oman
|
| Year: | 1995 |
| Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.201/4,WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
 Algeria
|
| Year: | 1996 |
| Document Source: | WHC-96/CONF.201/7B |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
Algeria
|
| Year: | 1995 |
| Document Source: | WHC-95/CONF.203/5,WHC-95/CONF.203/5 Add.1 |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
Algeria
|
| Year: | 1994 |
| Document Source: | WHC.94/CONF.003/16 |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: |
Algeria
|
| Year: | 1993 |
| Document Source: | WHC-93/CONF.002/14 |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| States Parties: | Jerusalem (Site proposed by Jordan) |
| Year: | 1982 |
| Document Source: | CLT-82/CONF.014/3,CLT-82/CONF.014/6 |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| Other Threats: | Loss of historical authenticity |
| States Parties: |
 Lebanon
|
| Year: | 2002 |
| Document Source: | WHC-02/CONF.202/17 |
| Threats*: | Legal framework |
| Other Threats: | Important conservation problems |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
