Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

7
Reports
7
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 1994close
Date end:1994close
Threats* : Financial resourcesclose
Galápagos Islands (1994)
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC.94/CONF.003/07Rev
Threats*: Financial resources
Hanseatic City of Lübeck (1994)
States Parties: Germany
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2
Threats*: Financial resources
Island of Mozambique (1994)
States Parties: Mozambique
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Precarious state of conservation of the stone
Kizhi Pogost (1994)
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.2,WHC.94/CONF.003/16
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Lack of fire /lightning protection; Deformation and deterioration of the structures
Mount Nimba Strict Nature Reserve (1994)
States Parties: Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Financial resources
Danger List:  Yes
Timbuktu (1994)
States Parties: Mali
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.001/3B Add.4,WHC-94/CONF.003/6,WHC-94/CONF.003/6 Add.
Threats*: Financial resources
Other Threats: Vulnerability of the mosques
Danger List:  Yes
Virunga National Park (1994)
States Parties: Democratic Republic of the Congo
Year: 1994
Document Source: WHC-94/CONF.003/6
Threats*: Financial resources
Properties
file_download
Categories
file_download
Regions
file_download
States Parties
Côte d'Ivoire Democratic Republic of the Congo Ecuador Germany Guinea Mali Mozambique Russian Federation
Threats
Financial resources 7

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top