Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x

State of Conservation

76
Reports
76
Properties concerned
56
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Culturalclose
Date Start: 2016close
Date end:2016close
Threats* : Management systems/ management planclose
States Parties: Egypt
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Ethiopia
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Structural instability of Stele 3
States Parties: China
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Tunisia
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Libya
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Iraq
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A,WHC/17/41.COM/INF.7 Rev
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Fragile mud brick structures
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Poland
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Slow process of consultation with local communities.
States Parties: Oman
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Deterioration of the earthen structures of the Fort
States Parties: State of Palestine
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Degradation of the architectural complex of the Church of the Nativity
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Germany
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Peru
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Continuous deterioration of earthen architecture structures and decorated surfaces from lack of conservation and maintenance practices
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Instability and risk of collapse of the Cerro Rico; Deficiencies in conservation: special attention required for the restoration and upgrading of structures with residential use and the archaeological industrial heritage
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Ecuador
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Dominican Republic
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
States Parties: Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Serious deterioration of materials and structure; Deterioration of the architectural and urban coherence and integrity of the property
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Syrian Arab Republic
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7A.Add
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Danger List:  Yes
States Parties: Russian Federation
Year: 2016
Document Source: WHC/16/40.COM/7B
Threats*: Management systems/ management plan
Other Threats: Lack of monitoring

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top