State of Conservation
24
Reports
24
Properties concerned
21
States Parties with SOC reports
Property Category:Naturalclose
Date Start:
2000close
Date end:2000close
| States Parties: |
 Niger
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Decline in wildlife populations |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Belarus Poland
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 Côte d'Ivoire
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 Ecuador
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 Australia
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.203/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Need for more effective catchment management in lands adjacent to the Park |
| States Parties: |
Australia
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 Tunisia
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9,WHC-99/CONF.204/INF.11 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Excessive salinity of the water |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Brazil
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Australia
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 India
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 Indonesia
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 Colombia
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 Central African Republic
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Zambia Zimbabwe
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
 Kenya
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/5,WHC-2000/CONF.204/10 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| States Parties: |
Côte d'Ivoire Guinea
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Uganda
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Other Threats: | Unsustainable resource use practices |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
 Democratic Republic of the Congo
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Danger List: | Yes |
| States Parties: |
Ecuador
|
| Year: | 2000 |
| Document Source: | WHC-2000/CONF.202/4,WHC-2000/CONF.204/9 |
| Threats*: | Management systems/ management plan |
| Danger List: | Yes |
* :
The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).
** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.
