Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

8
Reports
8
Properties concerned
9
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2015close
Date end:2015close
Threats* : Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
aksumAksum ethiopia Ethiopia 2015 Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Structural instability of Stele 3
 No
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2015 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No
cultural landscape of honghe hani rice terracesCultural Landscape of Honghe Hani Rice Terraces china China 2015 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No
historic centre of limaHistoric Centre of Lima peru Peru 2015 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No
liverpool – maritime mercantile cityLiverpool – Maritime Mercantile City united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2015 Interpretative and visitation facilities, Yes
maloti-drakensberg parkMaloti-Drakensberg Park lesotho,south africa Lesotho
South Africa		 2015 Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Need for further research and documentation to establish an inventory of rock art in Sehlabathebe National Park; Need for study of the potential cultural contribution of other landscape elements to the cultural values of Sehlabathebe National Park
 No
van nellefabriekVan Nellefabriek netherlands (kingdom of the) Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 2015 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No
vat phou and associated ancient settlements within the champasak cultural landscapeVat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape lao people's democratic republic Lao People's Democratic Republic 2015 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top