Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

9
Reports
9
Properties concerned
8
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2009close
Date end:2009close
Threats* : Interpretative and visitation facilitiesclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
archaeological site of cyreneArchaeological Site of Cyrene libya Libya 2009 Interpretative and visitation facilities,
Other Threats: Inadequate on-site security and control systems
 No
city of bathCity of Bath united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2009 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No
colonial city of santo domingoColonial City of Santo Domingo dominican republic Dominican Republic 2009 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No
historic centre of bruggeHistoric Centre of Brugge belgium Belgium 2009 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No
historic ensemble of the potala palace, lhasaHistoric Ensemble of the Potala Palace, Lhasa china China 2009 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No
parthian fortresses of nisaParthian Fortresses of Nisa turkmenistan Turkmenistan 2009 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No
rock drawings in valcamonicaRock Drawings in Valcamonica italy Italy 2009 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No
sangiran early man siteSangiran Early Man Site indonesia Indonesia 2009 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No
stonehenge, avebury and associated sitesStonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 2009 Interpretative and visitation facilities, No

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top