Take advantage of the search to browse through the World Heritage Centre information.

i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
ix
x
State of Conservation Search

State of Conservation

11
Reports
11
Properties concerned
6
States Parties with SOC reports
bar_chart Statistics view_list List table_chart Table pin_drop Map
Excel File .xls All SOC (Zip file) .zip
Date Start: 2004close
Date end:2004close
Threats* : Land conversionclose
Site State Party Year Threats* Danger List
abu menaAbu Mena egypt Egypt 2004 Land conversion, Yes
chan chan archaeological zoneChan Chan Archaeological Zone peru Peru 2004 Land conversion,
Other Threats: Increase in salt contamination of the mud-brick
Yes
city of cuzcoCity of Cuzco peru Peru 2004 Land conversion,
Other Threats: Deliberate neglect of historic properties
No
garamba national parkGaramba National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Land conversion, Yes
isimangaliso wetland parkiSimangaliso Wetland Park south africa South Africa 2004 Land conversion, No
kahuzi-biega national parkKahuzi-Biega National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Land conversion, Yes
mount kenya national park/natural forestMount Kenya National Park/Natural Forest kenya Kenya 2004 Land conversion, No
okapi wildlife reserveOkapi Wildlife Reserve democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Land conversion, Yes
rice terraces of the philippine cordillerasRice Terraces of the Philippine Cordilleras philippines Philippines 2004 Land conversion, Yes
salonga national parkSalonga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Land conversion, Yes
virunga national parkVirunga National Park democratic republic of the congo Democratic Republic of the Congo 2004 Land conversion, Yes

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top